Cited by 1,182Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Efficacy of rivastigmine in dementia with Lewy bodies: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled international study

Open access
McKeith, Ian, Del Ser, Teodoro, Spano, PierFranco, Emre, Murat, Wesnes, Keith, Anand, Ravi, Cicin-Sain, Ana, Ferrara, Roberto +1 more·2000·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Dementia with Lewy bodies is a common form of dementia in the elderly, characterised clinically by fluctuating cognitive impairment, attention deficits, visual hallucinations, parkinsonism, and other neuropsychiatric features. Neuroleptic medication can provoke severe sensitivity reactions in patients with dementia of this type. Many deficits in cholinergic neurotransmission are seen in the brain of patients with Lewy-body dementia; therefore, drugs enhancing central cholinergic function represent a rationally-based therapeutic approach to this disorder. Rivastigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, was tested in a group of clinically characterised patients with Lewy-body dementia. Methods A placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre study was done in 120 patients with Lewy-body dementia from the UK, Spain, and Italy. Individuals were given up to 12 mg rivastigmine daily or placebo for 20 weeks, followed by 3 weeks rest. Assessment by means of the neuropsychiatric inventory was made at baseline, and again at weeks 12, 20, and 23. A computerised cognitive assessment system and neuropsychological tests were also used, and patients underwent close medical and laboratory safety analysis. Findings Patients taking rivastigmine were significantly less apathetic and anxious, and had fewer delusions and hallucinations while on treatment than controls. Almost twice as many patients on rivastigmine (37, 63%), than on placebo (18, 30%), showed at least a 30% improvement from baseline. In the computerised cognitive assessment system and the neuropsychological tests, patients were significantly faster and better than those on placebo, particularly on tasks with a substantial attentional component. Both predefined primary efficacy measures differed significantly between rivastigmine and placebo. After drug discontinuation differences between rivastigmine and placebo tended to disappear. Known adverse events of cholinesterase inhibitors (nausea, vomiting, anorexia) were seen more frequently with rivastigmine than with placebo, but safety and tolerability of the drug in these mostly multimorbid patients were judged acceptable. Interpretation Rivastigmine 6-12 mg daily produces statistically and clinically significant behavioural effects in patients with Lewy-body dementia, and seems safe and well tolerated if titrated individually.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03399-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An RCT found no difference between rivastigmine and placebo on overall NPI scores or on a "Lewy body cluster" of symptoms (delusions, hallucinations, apathy, and depression) in Lewy body dementia.

    “However, an RCT found no difference between rivastigmine and placebo on overall NPI scores or on a “Lewy body cluster” of symptoms (delusions, hallucinations, apathy, and depression).148”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKeith, I., Del Ser, T., Spano, P., Emre, M., Wesnes, K., Anand, R., Cicin-Sain, A., Ferrara, R., & Spiegel, R.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • Istanbul University (TR)
  • Novartis (United States) (US)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Novartis (Italy) (IT)
Corresponding author
McKeith, Ian
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-12
Volume
356
Issue
9247
Pages
2031-2036
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2116249921
Cited by
1,182
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 41
FWCI
42.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
rivastigmine, dementia with Lewy bodies, cholinesterase inhibitors, cholinergic dysfunction, neuropsychiatric symptoms, delusions and hallucinations, apathy, anxiety, cognitive impairment, drug safety and tolerability, attention deficits
MeSH terms
Rivastigmine, Aged, Carbamates, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Lewy Body Disease, Phenylcarbamates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review