Cited by 327Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Donepezil for the Treatment of Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease

Open access
Howard, Robert J., Juszczak, Edmund, Ballard, Clive G., Bentham, Peter, Brown, Richard G., Bullock, Roger, Burns, Alistair S., Holmes, Clive +10 more·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Agitation is a common and distressing symptom in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Cholinesterase inhibitors improve cognitive outcomes in such patients, but the benefits of these drugs for behavioral disturbances are unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned 272 patients with Alzheimer's disease who had clinically significant agitation and no response to a brief psychosocial treatment program to receive 10 mg of donepezil per day (128 patients) or placebo (131 patients) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was a change in the score on the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) (on a scale of 29 to 203, with higher scores indicating more agitation) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the effects of donepezil and those of placebo on the basis of the change in CMAI scores from baseline to 12 weeks (estimated mean difference in change [the value for donepezil minus that for placebo], -0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.35 to 4.22). Twenty-two of 108 patients (20.4%) in the placebo group and 22 of 113 (19.5%) in the donepezil group had a reduction of 30% or greater in the CMAI score (the value for donepezil minus that for placebo, -0.9 percentage point; 95% CI, -11.4 to 9.6). There were also no significant differences between the placebo and donepezil groups in scores for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale, or the Clinician's Global Impression of Change. CONCLUSIONS: In this 12-week trial, donepezil was not more effective than placebo in treating agitation in patients with Alzheimer's disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00142324 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa066583

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All activity studies were in care homes except one, in which some participants attended a day centre and others lived in a care home.

    “All studies were in care homes except one, in which some participants attended a day centre and others lived in a care home. 27”
  • Donepezil showed no benefit for clinically significant agitation over 12 weeks in a large RCT, or for overall change in neuropsychiatric inventory scores in a longer term trial with up to four years' follow-up.

    “In addition, donepezil showed no benefit for clinically significant agitation over 12 weeks in a large RCT,147 or for overall change in neuropsychiatric inventory scores in a longer term trial with up to four years’ follow-up.98”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howard, R. J., Juszczak, E., Ballard, C. G., Bentham, P., Brown, R. G., Bullock, R., Burns, A. S., Holmes, C., Jacoby, R., Johnson, T., Knapp, M., Lindesay, J., O'Brien, J. T., Wilcock, G., Katona, C., Jones, R. W., DeCesare, J., & Rodger, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB)
  • Victoria Hospital (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • The Research Institute for the Care of Older People (GB)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-10-04
Volume
357
Issue
14
Pages
1382-1392
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2136332296
Cited by
327
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
donepezil, Alzheimer's disease, agitation, cholinesterase inhibitors, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, behavioral problems, placebo comparison, psychosocial interventions, caregiver distress, Neuropsychiatric Inventory
MeSH terms
Donepezil, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Indans, Male, Piperidines, Psychomotor Agitation, Psychotherapy, Social Support, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review