Cited by 6Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

Observational versus randomised trial evidence

Open access
Lawlor, Debbie A, Smith, George Davey, Bruckdorfer, K Richard, Tilling, Kate, Ebrahim, Shah·2004·The Lancet

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16925-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In observational studies, the key source of confounding is unmeasured or poorly measured confounders.

    “In observational studies, the key source of confounding will be unmeasured or poorly measured confounders.19,20”

    From Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology (2017) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawlor, D. A., Smith, G. D., Bruckdorfer, K. R., Tilling, K., & Ebrahim, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Lawlor, Debbie A
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
364
Issue
9436
Pages
754-755
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1567776151
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
vitamin C, plasma ascorbic acid, coronary heart disease mortality, fruit and vegetable intake, EPIC-Norfolk study, Heart Protection Study, vitamin supplementation, cardiovascular risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review