The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2–3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Early improvements in disease-free survival have been noted when an aromatase inhibitor is given either instead of or sequentially after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with oestrogen-receptor-positive early breast cancer. However, little information exists on the long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors after treatment, and whether these early improvements lead to real gains in survival. METHODS 4724 postmenopausal patients with unilateral invasive, oestrogen-receptor-positive or oestrogen-receptor-unknown breast cancer who were disease-free on 2-3 years of tamoxifen, were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane (n=2352) or to continue tamoxifen (n=2372) for the remainder of a 5-year endocrine treatment period. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival; overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were intention-to-treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN11883920. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 55.7 months (range 0-89.7), 809 events contributing to the analysis of disease-free survival had been reported (354 exemestane, 455 tamoxifen); unadjusted hazard ratio 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.88, p=0.0001) in favour of exemestane, absolute benefit 3.3% (95% CI 1.6-4.9) by end of treatment (ie, 2.5 years after randomisation). 222 deaths occurred in the exemestane group compared with 261 deaths in the tamoxifen group; unadjusted hazard ratio 0.85 (95% CI 0.71-1.02, p=0.08), 0.83 (0.69-1.00, p=0.05) when 122 patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative disease were excluded. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that early improvements in disease-free survival noted in patients who switch to exemestane after 2-3 years on tamoxifen persist after treatment, and translate into a modest improvement in overall survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coombes, R. C., Hall, E., Gibson, L. J., Paridaens, R., Jassem, J., Delozier, T., Jones, S. E., Alvarez, I., Bertelli, G., Ortmann, O., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040331 · Cited by 1,759
Self-citationLønning, P. E., Geisler, J., Krag, L. E., Erikstein, B., Bremnes, Y., Hagen, A. I., Schlichting, E., Lien, E. A., Øfjord, E. S., Paolini, J., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.07.097 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Cited by
Cuzick, J., Sestak, I., Baum, M., Buzdar, A., Howell, A., Dowsett, M., & Forbes, J. F. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70257-6 · Cited by 1,674
Self-citationCombinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era
Al-Lazikani, B., Banerji, U., & Workman, P. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2284 · Cited by 1,070
Luminal B Breast Cancer: Molecular Characterization, Clinical Management, and Future Perspectives
Ades, F., Zardavas, D., Bozovic-Spasojevic, I., Pugliano, L., Fumagalli, D., de Azambuja, E., Viale, G., Sotiriou, C., & Piccart, M. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.54.1870 · Cited by 435
Aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, and breast cancer
Chumsri, S., Howes, T., Bao, T., Sabnis, G., & Brodie, A. (2011) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.02.001 · Cited by 401
Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in early breast cancer (TEAM): a randomised phase 3 trial
van de Velde, C. J., Rea, D., Seynaeve, C., Putter, H., Hasenburg, A., Vannetzel, J.-M., Paridaens, R., Markopoulos, C., Hozumi, Y., Hille, E. T., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62312-4 · Cited by 372
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Coombes, R., Kilburn, L., Snowdon, C., Paridaens, R., Coleman, R., Jones, S., Jassem, J., Van de Velde, C., Delozier, T., Alvarez, I., Del Mastro, L., Ortmann, O., Diedrich, K., Coates, A., Bajetta, E., Holmberg, S., Dodwell, D., Mickiewicz, E., Andersen, J., Lønning, P., Cocconi, G., Forbes, J., Castiglione, M., Stuart, N., Stewart, A., Fallowfield, L., Bertelli, G., Hall, E., Bogle, R., Carpentieri, M., Colajori, E., Subar, M., Ireland, E., & Bliss, J.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 369
- Issue
- 9561
- Pages
- 559-570
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2167238270
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 48.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2–3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60200-1
- The paper
- Coombes, R., Kilburn, L., Snowdon, C., Paridaens, R., Coleman, R., Jones, S., Jassem, J., Van de Velde, C., Delozier, T., Alvarez, I., Del Mastro, L., Ortmann, O., Diedrich, K., Coates, A., Bajetta, E., Holmberg, S., Dodwell, D., Mickiewicz, E., Andersen, J., . . . Bliss, J. (2007). Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2–3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60200-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.