Cited by 144Human Rights and DevelopmentStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyHealth and Medical Studies

Towards good practice for health statistics: lessons from the Millennium Development Goal health indicators

Open access
Murray, Christopher JL·2007·The Lancet

Abstract

Health statistics are at the centre of an increasing number of worldwide health controversies. Several factors are sharpening the tension between the supply and demand for high quality health information, and the health-related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) provide a high-profile example. With thousands of indicators recommended but few measured well, the worldwide health community needs to focus its efforts on improving measurement of a small set of priority areas. Priority indicators should be selected on the basis of public-health significance and several dimensions of measurability. Health statistics can be divided into three types: crude, corrected, and predicted. Health statistics are necessary inputs to planning and strategic decision making, programme implementation, monitoring progress towards targets, and assessment of what works and what does not. Crude statistics that are biased have no role in any of these steps; corrected statistics are preferred. For strategic decision making, when corrected statistics are unavailable, predicted statistics can play an important part. For monitoring progress towards agreed targets and assessment of what works and what does not, however, predicted statistics should not be used. Perhaps the most effective method to decrease controversy over health statistics and to encourage better primary data collection and the development of better analytical methods is a strong commitment to provision of an explicit data audit trail. This initiative would make available the primary data, all post-data collection adjustments, models including covariates used for farcasting and forecasting, and necessary documentation to the public.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60415-2

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accurate interpretation and responsible use of health estimates requires understanding of the input data on which estimates were based, including their quality, and of the methods used to derive the estimates from the input data.

    “Accurate interpretation and responsible use of health estimates requires understanding of the input data on which estimates were based, including their quality, and of the methods used to derive the estimates from the input data.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Naik G WHO misses AIDS-treatment goal The Wall Street Journal (New York) July 12, 2004 http://ww2.aegis.com/news/wsj/2004/WJ040717.html (accessed Feb 21, 2007).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, C. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Murray, Christopher JL
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
369
Issue
9564
Pages
862-873
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2066141375
Cited by
144
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
56.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
health statistics, Millennium Development Goals, health indicators, indicator measurement, primary data collection, forecasting, health monitoring, data quality
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Health Priorities, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Organizational Objectives, Social Change, Statistics as Topic, Global Health, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review