Cited by 579Research Data Management PracticesElectronic Health Records SystemsPublic Health Policies and Education

A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health

Open access
van Panhuis, Willem G, Paul, Proma, Emerson, Claudia, Grefenstette, John, Wilder, Richard, Herbst, Abraham J, Heymann, David, Burke, Donald S·2014·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the current information age, the use of data has become essential for decision making in public health at the local, national, and global level. Despite a global commitment to the use and sharing of public health data, this can be challenging in reality. No systematic framework or global operational guidelines have been created for data sharing in public health. Barriers at different levels have limited data sharing but have only been anecdotally discussed or in the context of specific case studies. Incomplete systematic evidence on the scope and variety of these barriers has limited opportunities to maximize the value and use of public health data for science and policy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of potential barriers to public health data sharing. Documents that described barriers to sharing of routinely collected public health data were eligible for inclusion and reviewed independently by a team of experts. We grouped identified barriers in a taxonomy for a focused international dialogue on solutions. RESULTS: Twenty potential barriers were identified and classified in six categories: technical, motivational, economic, political, legal and ethical. The first three categories are deeply rooted in well-known challenges of health information systems for which structural solutions have yet to be found; the last three have solutions that lie in an international dialogue aimed at generating consensus on policies and instruments for data sharing. CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous effect of multiple interacting barriers ranging from technical to intangible issues has greatly complicated advances in public health data sharing. A systematic framework of barriers to data sharing in public health will be essential to accelerate the use of valuable information for the global good.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1144

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing medical data is not fully exploited by machine learning primarily because it sits in data silos and privacy concerns restrict access to this data.

    “Existing medical data is not fully exploited by ML primarily because it sits in data silos and privacy concerns restrict access to this data.”

    From The future of digital health with federated learning (2020) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Background describes routinely collected public-health data as underused, and Results > Legal barriers says privacy concerns can lead to restrictive data-access policies. Results > Technical barriers describes difficulties integrating datasets. The paper does not establish that machine learning is the affected use or that data silos and privacy are the primary reasons medical data is underexploited. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Health data is highly sensitive and its usage is tightly regulated, making large databases for AI training hard to obtain.

    “Data like this is hard to obtain, because health data is highly sensitive and its usage is tightly regulated6.”

    From The future of digital health with federated learning (2020) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [39]Lungo JH Nhampossa JL The Impacts of Legacy Information Systems in Reporting Routine Health Delivery Services: Case Studies from Mozambique and Tanzania International ICT Workshop 2004 2004 Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania University of Oslo
  2. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1144/prepub

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Panhuis, W. G., Paul, P., Emerson, C., Grefenstette, J., Wilder, R., Herbst, A. J., Heymann, D., & Burke, D. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Gates Foundation (US)
  • Chatham House (GB)
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2014-11-05
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1144-1144
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123737882
Cited by
579
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 7
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (49276)
  • Wellcome Trust (097410)
  • National Institutes of Health (5u54gm088491-10)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54 GM088491, 5U54GM088491)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
public health data sharing, barriers to data sharing, routinely collected health data, health information systems, data sharing policy
MeSH terms
Communication Barriers, Humans, Public Health, Global Health, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review