Cited by 352Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMedical Coding and Health Information

Civil registration systems and vital statistics: successes and missed opportunities

Open access
Mahapatra, Prasanta, Shibuya, Kenji, Lopez, Alan D, Coullare, Francesca, Notzon, Francis C, Rao, Chalapati, Szreter, Simon·2007·The Lancet

Abstract

Vital statistics generated through civil registration systems are the major source of continuous monitoring of births and deaths over time. The usefulness of vital statistics depends on their quality. In the second paper in this Series we propose a comprehensive and practical framework for assessment of the quality of vital statistics. With use of routine reports to the UN and cause-of-death data reported to WHO, we review the present situation and past trends of vital statistics in the world and note little improvement in worldwide availability of general vital statistics or cause-of-death statistics. Only a few developing countries have been able to improve their civil registration and vital statistics systems in the past 50 years. International efforts to improve comparability of vital statistics seem to be effective, and there is reasonable progress in collection and publication of data. However, worldwide efforts to improve data have been limited to sporadic and short-term measures. We conclude that countries and developmental partners have not recognised that civil registration systems are a priority.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61308-7

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahapatra, P., Shibuya, K., Lopez, A. D., Coullare, F., Notzon, F. C., Rao, C., & Szreter, S.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • United Nations (US)
  • National Center for Health Statistics (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Mahapatra, Prasanta
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
370
Issue
9599
Pages
1653-1663
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2044579012
Cited by
352
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
41.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
civil registration, vital statistics, cause of death statistics, birth and death registration, developing countries
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, Developing Countries, Health Policy, Humans, International Cooperation, Public Health, Registries, Statistics as Topic, United Nations, Vital Statistics, World Health Organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review