Oral use of Swedish moist snuff (snus) and risk for cancer of the mouth, lung, and pancreas in male construction workers: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background Although classified as carcinogenic, snuff is used increasingly in several populations. Scandinavian moist snuff (snus) has been proposed as a less harmful alternative to smoking, but precise data on the independent associations of snus use with site-specific cancers are sparse. We aimed to assess the risks for cancer of the oral cavity, lung, and pancreas. Methods Detailed information about tobacco smoking and snus use was obtained from 279 897 male Swedish construction workers in 1978-92. Complete follow-up until end of 2004 was accomplished through links with population and health registers. To distinguish possible effects of snus from those of smoking, we focused on 125 576 workers who were reported to be never-smokers at entry. Adjusted relative risks were derived from Cox proportional hazards regression models. Findings 60 cases of oral, 154 of lung, and 83 of pancreatic cancer were recorded in never-smokers. Snus use was independently associated with increased risk of pancreatic cancer (relative risk for ever-users of snus 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.3, compared with never-users of any tobacco), but was unrelated to incidence of oral (0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.7) and lung cancer (0.8, 0.5-1.3). Interpretation Use of Swedish snus should be added to the list of tentative risk factors for pancreatic cancer. We were unable to confirm any excess of oral or lung cancer in snus users.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among ever snus users compared to never-users, snus use is associated with a reduced risk of oral cancer (RR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.7).
“Reduced risk for oral cancer (RR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.7)among ever snus users compared to never-users (Luo et al. 2007)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Luo et al. 2007
Among ever snus users compared to never-users, there is an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (RR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2-3.3) and reduced risk for oral (RR = 0.8; 95% CI: 0.4-1.7) and lung cancer (RR = 0.8; 95% CI: 0.5-1.3).
“increased risk of pancreatic cancer (RR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2-3.3),but reduced risk for oral (RR = 0.8; 95% CI: 0.4-1.7)and lung cancer (RR = 0.8; 95% CI: 0.5-1.3)among ever snus users compared to never-users (Luo et al. 2007).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Luo et al. 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012
Ng, M., Freeman, M. K., Fleming, T. D., Robinson, M., Dwyer-Lindgren, L., Thomson, B., Wollum, A., Sanman, E., Wulf, S., Lopez, A. D., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284692 · Cited by 1,576 · see citing works
Pharmacology of nicotine: addiction, smoking-induced disease, and therapeutics
Benowitz, N. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094742 · Cited by 979 · see citing works
Ford, P. J., & Rich, A. M. (2021) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15513 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Drug addiction is associated with leukocyte telomere length
Yang, Z., Ye, J., Li, C., Zhou, D., Shen, Q., Wu, J., Cao, L., Wang, T., Cui, D., He, S., et al. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01542 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Kotlyar, M., Hertsgaard, L. A., Lindgren, B. R., Jensen, J. A., Carmella, S. G., Stepanov, I., Murphy, S. E., Hecht, S. S., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2011) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0349 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
The effect of swedish snuff (snus) on offspring birthweight: a sibling analysis
Juárez, S. P., & Merlo, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065611 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Luo, J., Ye, W., Zendehdel, K., Adami, J., Adami, H.-O., Boffetta, P., & Nyrén, O.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 369
- Issue
- 9578
- Pages
- 2015-2020
- ISSN
- 0140-6736
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review