Cited by 171Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyRetinal Development and Disorders

Association between the SERPING1 gene and age-related macular degeneration: a two-stage case–control study

Open access
Ennis, Sarah, Jomary, Catherine, Mullins, Robert, Cree, Angela, Chen, Xiaoli, MacLeod, Alex, Jones, Stephen, Collins, Andrew +2 more·2008·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Age-related macular degeneration is the most prevalent form of visual impairment and blindness in developed countries. Genetic studies have made advancements in establishing the molecular cause of this disease, identifying mutations in the complement factor H (CFH) gene and a locus on chromosome 10 encompassing the HTRA1/LOC387715/ARMS2 genes. Variants in complement 3 (C3) and an HLA locus containing both factor B and C2 genes have also been implicated. We aimed to identify further genetic risk factors for this disease.Methods We used a case-control study design in a UK sample of patients with age-related macular degeneration (n=479) and controls (n=479) and undertook a low-density screen of 32 genes using 93 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Genes were selected as candidates on the basis of potential functional relevance to age-related macular degeneration. Significant initial findings were confirmed by replication in an independent US cohort of 248 unrelated patients with disease and 252 controls, and by high-density genotyping around association signals.Findings The SNP variant rs2511989, located within intron six of the SERPING1 gene, showed highly significant genotypic association with age-related macular degeneration (uncorrected p=4.0x10(-5), corrected p=0.00372). We detected no evidence for association between disease and the other 31 candidate genes. The odds ratio for age-related macular degeneration in rs2511989 G/A heterozygotes compared with wild type G/G homozygotes was 0.63 (95% CI 0.47-0.84). A similar comparison of the A/A homozygotes with the wild type yielded an odds ratio of 0.44 (0.31-0.64). We replicated the observed genotypic association in a US cohort (p=0.008). Furthermore, a secondary high-density genotyping study across the SERPING1 gene region identified five additional SNP variants similarly associated with age-related macular degeneration (rs2244169, rs2511990, rs2509897, rs1005510, and rs2511988).Interpretation Genetic variation in SERPING1 significantly alters susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. SERPING1 encodes the C1 inhibitor, which has a crucial role in inhibition of complement component 1 (C1) and might implicate the classic pathway of complement activation in this disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61348-3

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ennis, S., Jomary, C., Mullins, R., Cree, A., Chen, X., MacLeod, A., Jones, S., Collins, A., Stone, E., & Lotery, A.
Affiliations
  • Southampton General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Lotery, Andrew
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
372
Issue
9652
Pages
1828-1834
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2032834555
Cited by
171
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 22
FWCI
23.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Macula Vision Research Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (076169)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY017451, EY016822, R01EY016822, EY017451)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
degeneration, SERPING1, genetic susceptibility, single nucleotide polymorphisms, complement system, genetic risk factors, replication study, complement factor H
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Complement C1 Inactivator Proteins, Female, Genotype, United Kingdom, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Case-Control Studies, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Complement C1 Inhibitor Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review