Cited by 31Academic integrity and plagiarismAcademic Publishing and Open AccessPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Protocols, probity, and publication

Summerskill, William, Collingridge, David, Frankish, Helen·2009·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60590-0

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Summerskill, W., Collingridge, D., & Frankish, H.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
373
Issue
9668
Pages
992
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2121370401
Cited by
31
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
research ethics, publication ethics, research integrity, transparency, author responsibility
MeSH terms
Clinical Protocols, Forecasting, United Kingdom, Research Design, Scientific Misconduct, Journalism, Medical, Ethics, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review