The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial
Open accessAbstract
Summary Background Cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) reduce scarring after myocardial infarction, increase viable myocardium, and boost cardiac function in preclinical models. We aimed to assess safety of such an approach in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Methods In the prospective, randomised CArdiosphere-Derived aUtologous stem CElls to reverse ventricUlar dySfunction (CADUCEUS) trial, we enrolled patients 2–4 weeks after myocardial infarction (with left ventricular ejection fraction of 25–45%) at two medical centres in the USA. An independent data coordinating centre randomly allocated patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive CDCs or standard care. For patients assigned to receive CDCs, autologous cells grown from endomyocardial biopsy specimens were infused into the infarct-related artery 1·5–3 months after myocardial infarction. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients at 6 months who died due to ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or sudden unexpected death, or had myocardial infarction after cell infusion, new cardiac tumour formation on MRI, or a major adverse cardiac event (MACE; composite of death and hospital admission for heart failure or non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction). We also assessed preliminary efficacy endpoints on MRI by 6 months. Data analysers were masked to group assignment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00893360. Findings Between May 5, 2009, and Dec 16, 2010, we randomly allocated 31 eligible participants of whom 25 were included in a per-protocol analysis (17 to CDC group and eight to standard of care). Mean baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 39% (SD 12) and scar occupied 24% (10) of left ventricular mass. Biopsy samples yielded prescribed cell doses within 36 days (SD 6). No complications were reported within 24 h of CDC infusion. By 6 months, no patients had died, developed cardiac tumours, or MACE in either group. Four patients (24%) in the CDC group had serious adverse events compared with one control (13%; p=1·00). Compared with controls at 6 months, MRI analysis of patients treated with CDCs showed reductions in scar mass (p=0·001), increases in viable heart mass (p=0·01) and regional contractility (p=0·02), and regional systolic wall thickening (p=0·015). However, changes in end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and LVEF did not differ between groups by 6 months. Interpretation We show intracoronary infusion of autologous CDCs after myocardial infarction is safe, warranting the expansion of such therapy to phase 2 study. The unprecedented increases we noted in viable myocardium, which are consistent with therapeutic regeneration, merit further assessment of clinical outcomes. Funding US National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and Cedars-Sinai Board of Governors Heart Stem Cell Center.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for Cardiomyocyte Renewal in Humans
Bergmann, O., Bhardwaj, R. D., Bernard, S., Zdunek, S., Barnabé-Heider, F., Walsh, S., Zupicich, J., Alkass, K., Buchholz, B. A., Druid, H., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164680 · Cited by 3,130
Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials
Senn, S. (1994) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780131703 · Cited by 503
Cited by
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
O'Gara, P. T., Kushner, F. G., Ascheim, D. D., Casey, D. E., Chung, M. K., de Lemos, J. A., Ettinger, S. M., Fang, J. C., Fesmire, F. M., Franklin, B. A., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019 · Cited by 2,625
Functional screening identifies miRNAs inducing cardiac regeneration
Eulalio, A., Mano, M., Ferro, M. D., Zentilin, L., Sinagra, G., Zacchigna, S., & Giacca, M. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11739 · Cited by 1,029
Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 – 2014)
Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Kim, M. C. (2014) · Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy · doi:10.1517/14712598.2014.920813 · Cited by 837
Menasché, P., Vanneaux, V., Hagège, A., Bel, A., Cholley, B., Cacciapuoti, I., Parouchev, A., Benhamouda, N., Tachdjian, G., Tosca, L., et al. (2015) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv189 · Cited by 445
FOXO3: A Major Gene for Human Longevity - A Mini-Review
Morris, B. J., Willcox, D. C., Donlon, T. A., & Willcox, B. J. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000375235 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Makkar, R. R., Smith, R. R., Cheng, K., Malliaras, K., Thomson, L. E., Berman, D., Czer, L. S., Marbán, L., Mendizabal, A., Johnston, P. V., Russell, S. D., Schuleri, K. H., Lardo, A. C., Gerstenblith, G., & Marbán, E.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 379
- Issue
- 9819
- Pages
- 895-904
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2144327104
- Cited by
- 1,422
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 86.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60195-0
- The paper
- Makkar, R. R., Smith, R. R., Cheng, K., Malliaras, K., Thomson, L. E., Berman, D., Czer, L. S., Marbán, L., Mendizabal, A., Johnston, P. V., Russell, S. D., Schuleri, K. H., Lardo, A. C., Gerstenblith, G., & Marbán, E. (2012). Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60195-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.