Cited by 176Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Short-term versus long-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (Flec-SL): a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment trial

Kirchhof, Paulus, Andresen, Dietrich, Bosch, Ralph, Borggrefe, Martin, Meinertz, Thomas, Parade, Ulli, Ravens, Ursula, Samol, Alexander +4 more·2012·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Antiarrhythmic drugs prolong the atrial action potential and refractory period, and thereby prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation after cardioversion. The atrial action potential normalises after 2-4 weeks of sinus rhythm, suggesting that antiarrhythmic drugs might not be needed beyond that period. Therefore, we investigated whether short-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion is non-inferior to long-term treatment.Methods We enrolled patients in a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment trial between May 4, 2007, and March 12, 2010, at 44 centres in Germany. Eligible patients were adults with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing planned cardioversion. After successful cardioversion, patients were randomly assigned in permuted blocks of six per centre to: no antiarrhythmic drug treatment (control); treatment with flecainide (200-300 mg per day) for 4 weeks (short-term treatment); or flecainide for 6 months (long-term treatment). The primary endpoint was time to persistent atrial fibrillation or death. Patients and clinicians were unmasked to group assignment and treatment. The primary outcome was assessed in a core laboratory, members of which were masked to treatment group. Patients were monitored for 6 months by daily telemetric electrocardiograph (ECG) and centrally adjudicated Holter ECG recordings whenever atrial fibrillation was noted in two consecutive ECGs. Analyses were per protocol. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN62728742.Findings After assay sensitivity was established with 4-week follow-up data from 242 patients showing that flecainide was superior to no treatment (Kaplan-Meier survival 70·2%vs 52·5%; p=0·0160), the trial continued to compare short-term versus long-term treatment. The primary outcome occurred in 120 (46%) of 261 patients receiving short-term treatment and in 103 (39%) of 263 patients receiving long-term treatment (event-free survival 48·4% [95% CI 41·9-55·0] vs 56·4% [49·1-63·6]; Kaplan-Meier estimate of difference 7·9% [-1·9 to 17·7]; p=0·2081 for non-inferiority; margin prespecified at 12%). In a post-hoc landmark analysis of patients who had not reached the primary endpoint in the first month, long-term treatment was superior to short-term treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate of difference 14·3% [5·1-23·6]; hazard ratio 0·31 [0·18-0·56]; p=0·0001).Interpretation Short-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion is less effective than is long-term treatment, but can prevent most recurrences of atrial fibrillation.Funding The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 3M Medica, and MEDA Pharmaceuticals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60570-4

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirchhof, P., Andresen, D., Bosch, R., Borggrefe, M., Meinertz, T., Parade, U., Ravens, U., Samol, A., Steinbeck, G., Treszl, A., Wegscheider, K., & Breithardt, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Vivantes Klinikum (DE)
  • Klinikum Ludwigsburg (DE)
  • University of Mannheim (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Robert Bosch Hospital (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Kirchhof, Paulus
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
380
Issue
9838
Pages
238-246
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2108168179
Cited by
176
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01Gi0204, B11)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, cardioversion, antiarrhythmic drugs, flecainide, recurrence prevention, persistent atrial fibrillation, event-free survival, non-inferiority, atrial action potential, sinus rhythm maintenance, atrial fibrillation mortality
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Electric Countershock, Female, Flecainide, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review