Cited by 740Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Tobacco use in 3 billion individuals from 16 countries: an analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional household surveys

Giovino, Gary A, Mirza, Sara A, Samet, Jonathan M, Gupta, Prakash C, Jarvis, Martin J, Bhala, Neeraj, Peto, Richard, Zatonski, Witold +4 more·2012·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Despite the high global burden of diseases caused by tobacco, valid and comparable prevalence data for patterns of adult tobacco use and factors influencing use are absent for many low-income and middle-income countries. We assess these patterns through analysis of data from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS). Methods Between Oct 1, 2008, and March 15, 2010, GATS used nationally representative household surveys with comparable methods to obtain relevant information from individuals aged 15 years or older in 14 low-income and middle-income countries (Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Mexico, Philippines, Poland, Russia, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, Uruguay, and Vietnam). We compared weighted point estimates and 95% CIs of tobacco use between these 14 countries and with data from the 2008 UK General Lifestyle Survey and the 2006-07 US Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey. All these surveys had cross-sectional study designs. Findings In countries participating in GATS, 48·6% (95% CI 47·6-49·6) of men and 11·3% (10·7-12·0) of women were tobacco users. 40·7% of men (ranging from 21·6% in Brazil to 60·2% in Russia) and 5·0% of women (0·5% in Egypt to 24·4% in Poland) in GATS countries smoked a tobacco product. Manufactured cigarettes were favoured by most smokers (82%) overall, but smokeless tobacco and bidis were commonly used in India and Bangladesh. For individuals who had ever smoked daily, women aged 55-64 years at the time of the survey began smoking at an older age than did equivalently aged men in most GATS countries. However, those individuals who had ever smoked daily and were aged 25-34-years when surveyed started to do so at much the same age in both sexes. Quit ratios were very low (<20% overall) in China, India, Russia, Egypt, and Bangladesh. Interpretation The first wave of GATS showed high rates of smoking in men, early initiation of smoking in women, and low quit ratios, reinforcing the view that efforts to prevent initiation and promote cessation of tobacco use are needed to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. Funding Bloomberg Philanthropies' Initiative to Reduce Tobacco Use, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Brazilian and Indian Governments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61085-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giovino, G. A., Mirza, S. A., Samet, J. M., Gupta, P. C., Jarvis, M. J., Bhala, N., Peto, R., Zatonski, W., Hsia, J., Morton, J., Palipudi, K. M., & Asma, S.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Healis Sekhsaria Institute For Public Health (IN)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Giovino, Gary A
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
380
Issue
9842
Pages
668-679
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2113459167
Cited by
740
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 13
FWCI
56.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
tobacco use, smoking prevalence, low- and middle-income countries, Global Adult Tobacco Survey, sex differences in smoking, smoking initiation age, bidis, smokeless tobacco, smoking cessation, tobacco control, cross-national comparison, household surveys, Bangladesh, India, Russia, China, Egypt, Brazil, Thailand, Poland, Turkey, Ukraine, Vietnam, Mexico, Philippines
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Smoking, Tobacco, Smokeless, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review