Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 684

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240)

Open access
Tewari, Krishnansu S, Sill, Michael W, Penson, Richard T, Huang, Helen, Ramondetta, Lois M, Landrum, Lisa M, Oaknin, Ana, Reid, Thomas J, Leitao, Mario M, Michael, Helen E, DiSaia, Philip J, Copeland, Larry J, Creasman, William T, Stehman, Frederick B, Brady, Mark F, Burger, Robert A, Thigpen, J Tate, Birrer, Michael J, Waggoner, Steven E, Moore, David H, Look, Katherine Y, Koh, Wui-Jin, Monk, Bradley J·2017·The Lancet

Abstract

Background On August 14, 2014, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved the anti-angiogenesis drug, bevacizumab, for women with advanced cervical cancer based on a 2012 interim analysis of 271 deaths on GOG protocol 240. We now report the planned protocol-specified final analysis of the primary objective, overall survival (OS). Methods A phase III randomized trial using a 2×2 factorial design was conducted to determine whether intravenous chemotherapy [(cisplatin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 135 or 175 mg/m2) or (topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 days 1–3 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2)] with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) improves OS in recurrent/persistent/metastatic cervical cancer. Patients were prospectively stratified by performance status, prior radiosensitizing platinum, and disease status. We estimated enrolling 450 patients with 346 deaths at final analysis to provide 90% power to detect a 30% reduction in risk of death. Findings On March 7, 2014, 348 deaths occurred among 452 patients. Regimens administering bevacizumab continued to demonstrate significant improvement in OS: 16.8 vs 13.3 mos (HR 0.77;95% CI 0.62–0.95;p=0.0068). Updated progression-free survival also favored bevacizumab (HR 0.68;95% CI 0.56–0.84;p=0.0002). Final OS among 20% (n=91) not treated with prior pelvic radiotherapy was 24.5 (bevacizumab) vs 16.8 mos (without bevacizumab). Fistula (any grade) occurred in 14.5% (n=32) receiving bevacizumab (all previously irradiated). Grade 3+ fistula developed in 5.9% (n=13) and did not result in surgical emergency, sepsis and/or death. Post-progression OS was not significantly different among those who did and did not receive bevacizumab (median 8.4 vs 7.1 mos: HR 0.32;95% CI 0.66–1.05;p=0.06). Interpretation The benefit conferred by incorporation of bevacizumab is sustained with extended follow-up as evidenced by the survival curves remaining separated. Following progression on bevacizumab, a negative rebound effect was not observed. This represents proof-of-concept of the efficacy and tolerability of anti-angiogenesis therapy in advanced cervical cancer. Funding National Cancer Institute (USA).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31607-0

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 684

Metadata

Authors
Tewari, K. S., Sill, M. W., Penson, R. T., Huang, H., Ramondetta, L. M., Landrum, L. M., Oaknin, A., Reid, T. J., Leitao, M. M., Michael, H. E., DiSaia, P. J., Copeland, L. J., Creasman, W. T., Stehman, F. B., Brady, M. F., Burger, R. A., Thigpen, J. T., Birrer, M. J., Waggoner, S. E., Moore, D. H., Look, K. Y., Koh, W.-J., & Monk, B. J.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
390
Issue
10103
Pages
1654-1663
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2742133220
Cited by
684
References
30
FWCI
44.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31607-0
The paper
Tewari, K. S., Sill, M. W., Penson, R. T., Huang, H., Ramondetta, L. M., Landrum, L. M., Oaknin, A., Reid, T. J., Leitao, M. M., Michael, H. E., DiSaia, P. J., Copeland, L. J., Creasman, W. T., Stehman, F. B., Brady, M. F., Burger, R. A., Thigpen, J. T., Birrer, M. J., Waggoner, S. E., . . . Monk, B. J. (2017). Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240). The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31607-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.