The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma: State of the Art and Future Directions
Abstract
Globally, cervical cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality among women causing approximately 234,000 deaths annually among developing countries and killing 40,000 in developed nations. Most of these deaths occur in women with bulky or locally advanced cervical cancer, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IIB through IVA, when lesions are not amenable to high cure rates with surgery or radiation (RT). The standard prescription for RT used to treat locally advanced cervical cancer has been dictated by common practice and patterns of care studies. In contrast, the addition of concomitant chemotherapy to RT has been studied in a number of randomized prospective trials, which are discussed in detail. When added to RT, cisplatin reduces the relative risk of death from cervical carcinoma by approximately 50% by decreasing local/pelvic failure and distant metastases. In 1999, weekly intravenous cisplatin at 40 mg/m 2 for 6 weeks in combination with RT was established as a new standard for the treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. More recently, this recommendation has been expanded to include women with FIGO stage IB2 lesions as well as those with bulky stage IIA cancers. This monograph reviews the state of the art in treating locally advanced cervical cancer with combined chemotherapy and RT and discusses clinical and pathologic prognostic factors that impact cure. Quality of life during and after multimodality therapy is considered as well as ongoing clinical trials and future directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kosary, C. L. (1994) · Seminars in Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1002/ssu.2980100107 · Cited by 417
Cited by
Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection
Schiffman, M., Doorbar, J., Wentzensen, N., de Sanjosé, S., Fakhry, C., Monk, B. J., Stanley, M. A., & Franceschi, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.86 · Cited by 999
Self-citationMonk, B. J., Sill, M. W., Burger, R. A., Gray, H. J., Buekers, T. E., & Roman, L. D. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.9043 · Cited by 346
Self-citationMonk, B. J., Mas Lopez, L., Zarba, J. J., Oaknin, A., Tarpin, C., Termrungruanglert, W., Alber, J. A., Ding, J., Stutts, M. W., & Pandite, L. N. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.26.9571 · Cited by 264
Self-citationSims, T. T., El Alam, M. B., Karpinets, T. V., Dorta-Estremera, S., Hegde, V. L., Nookala, S., Yoshida-Court, K., Wu, X., Biegert, G. W. G., Delgado Medrano, A. Y., et al. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01741-x · Cited by 135
Javed, S., Sood, S., Rai, B., Bhattacharyya, S., Bagga, R., & Srinivasan, R. (2021) · Indian Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_709_20 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Monk, B. J., Tewari, K. S., & Koh, W.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-07-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2952-2965
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2131538171
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma: State of the Art and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.10.8324
- The paper
- Monk, B. J., Tewari, K. S., & Koh, W.-J. (2007). Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma: State of the Art and Future Directions. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.10.8324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.