Cited by 442Sex and Gender in HealthcareGender, Health, and Social InequalityDiversity and Career in Medicine

Disrupting gender norms in health systems: making the case for change

Open access
Hay, Katherine, McDougal, Lotus, Percival, Valerie, Henry, Sarah, Klugman, Jeni, Wurie, Haja, Raven, Joanna, Shabalala, Fortunate +24 more·2019·The Lancet

Abstract

Restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities are replicated and reinforced in health systems, contributing to gender inequalities in health. In this Series paper, we explore how to address all three through recognition and then with disruptive solutions. We used intersectional feminist theory to guide our systematic reviews, qualitative case studies based on lived experiences, and quantitative analyses based on cross-sectional and evaluation research. We found that health systems reinforce patients' traditional gender roles and neglect gender inequalities in health, health system models and clinic-based programmes are rarely gender responsive, and women have less authority as health workers than men and are often devalued and abused. With regard to potential for disruption, we found that gender equality policies are associated with greater representation of female physicians, which in turn is associated with better health outcomes, but that gender parity is insufficient to achieve gender equality. We found that institutional support and respect of nurses improves quality of care, and that women's empowerment collectives can increase health-care access and provider responsiveness. We see promise from social movements in supporting women's reproductive rights and policies. Our findings suggest we must view gender as a fundamental factor that predetermines and shapes health systems and outcomes. Without addressing the role of restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities within and outside health systems, we will not reach our collective ambitions of universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals. We propose action to systematically identify and address restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities in health systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30648-8

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [72]de Savigny D, Blanchet K, Adam T, eds. Applied systems thinking for health systems research: a methodological handbook. London: Open University Press, 2017
  2. [113]Witter S, Namakula J, Wurie H, The gendered health workforce: mixed methods analysis from four fragile and post-conflict contexts. Health Policy Plan 2017; 32 (suppl 5): v52– 62. 29244105 PMC5886261
  3. [114]George A, Theobald S, Morgan R, Hawkins K, Molyneux S. Snap shots from a photo competition: what does it reveal about close-to-community providers, gender and power in health systems? Human Resour Health 2015; 13: 57 PMC4556048 26323604
  4. [162]Minkler M, ed. Community organizing and community building for health and welfare, 3rd edn. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers Press, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hay, K., McDougal, L., Percival, V., Henry, S., Klugman, J., Wurie, H., Raven, J., Shabalala, F., Fielding-Miller, R., Dey, A., Dehingia, N., Morgan, R., Atmavilas, Y., Saggurti, N., Yore, J., Blokhina, E., Huque, R., Barasa, E., Bhan, N., Kharel, C., Silverman, J. G., Raj, A., Darmstadt, G. L., Greene, M. E., Hawkes, S., Heise, L., Henry, S., Heymann, J., Klugman, J., Levine, R., Raj, A., & Rao Gupta, G.
Affiliations
  • Gates Foundation (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • University of Sierra Leone (SL)
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Eswatini (SZ)
  • Sambodhi Research and Communications (IN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Population Council (IN)
  • First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg (RU)
  • ARK Foundation (BD)
  • KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KE)
  • HERD International (Nepal) (NP)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
393
Issue
10190
Pages
2535-2549
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2947175323
Cited by
442
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH112436)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (L60 MD011114)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
gender norms, gender inequality in health, health care system, female health workers, gender equality policy, female physicians, gender parity, nurses, women's empowerment, reproductive rights, social movements, intersectional feminism, universal health coverage, Sustainable Development Goals
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Global Health, Occupational Health, Nurse's Role, Healthcare Disparities, Sexism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review