Cited by 293Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesPublic Health Policies and Education

Measurement of Health Disparities, Health Inequities, and Social Determinants of Health to Support the Advancement of Health Equity

Open access
Penman-Aguilar, Ana, Talih, Makram, Huang, David, Moonesinghe, Ramal, Bouye, Karen, Beckles, Gloria·2016·Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Abstract

Reduction of health disparities and advancement of health equity in the United States require high-quality data indicative of where the nation stands vis-à-vis health equity, as well as proper analytic tools to facilitate accurate interpretation of these data. This article opens with an overview of health equity and social determinants of health. It then proposes a set of recommended practices in measurement of health disparities, health inequities, and social determinants of health at the national level to support the advancement of health equity, highlighting that (1) differences in health and its determinants that are associated with social position are important to assess; (2) social and structural determinants of health should be assessed and multiple levels of measurement should be considered; (3) the rationale for methodological choices made and measures chosen should be made explicit; (4) groups to be compared should be simultaneously classified by multiple social statuses; and (5) stakeholders and their communication needs can often be considered in the selection of analytic methods. Although much is understood about the role of social determinants of health in shaping the health of populations, researchers should continue to advance understanding of the pathways through which they operate on particular health outcomes. There is still much to learn and implement about how to measure health disparities, health inequities, and social determinants of health at the national level, and the challenges of health equity persist. We anticipate that the present discussion will contribute to the laying of a foundation for standard practice in the monitoring of national progress toward achievement of health equity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/phh.0000000000000373

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [8]Institute of Medicine Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare Washington, DC National Academies Press 2003 25032386
  2. [13]Penman-Aguilar A Bouye K Liburd LC Background and rationale MMWR Surveill Summ 2014 63 suppl 1 3 4 24743660
  3. [34]Harper S Lynch J Selected Comparisons of Measures of Health Disparities: A Review Using Databases Relevant to Healthy People 2010 Cancer-Related Objectives, in NCI Cancer Surveillance Monograph Series Bethesda, MD National Cancer Institute 2007
  4. [38]Frohlich KL Potvin L Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations Am J Public Health 2008 98 2 216 221 18172133 PMC2376882
  5. [39]Rose G Sick individuals and sick populations. 1985 Bull World Health Organ 2001 79 10 990 996 11693983 PMC2566665
  6. [45]Pamuk ER Social class inequality in infant mortality in England and Wales from 1921 to 1980 Eur J Popul 1988 4 1 1 21 11611750

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Penman-Aguilar, A., Talih, M., Huang, D., Moonesinghe, R., Bouye, K., & Beckles, G.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Published
2016-01
Volume
22
Issue
Supplement 1
Pages
S33-S42
ISSN
1078-4659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2435667741
Cited by
293
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
health disparities, social determinants of health, health equity, measurement practices, social status, structural determinants of health, multilevel measurement, stakeholder communication
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Humans, United States, Health Status Disparities, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review