Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of patients and plaques vulnerable to future coronary events with near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging: a prospective, cohort study

Open access
Waksman, Ron, Di Mario, Carlo, Torguson, Rebecca, Ali, Ziad A, Singh, Varinder, Skinner, William H, Artis, Andre K, Cate, Tim Ten, Powers, Eric, Kim, Christopher, Regar, Evelyn, Wong, S Chiu, Lewis, Stephen, Wykrzykowska, Joanna, Dube, Sandeep, Kazziha, Samer, van der Ent, Martin, Shah, Priti, Craig, Paige E, Zou, Quan, Kolm, Paul, Brewer, H Bryan, Garcia-Garcia, Hector M, Samady, Habib, Tobis, Jonathan, Zainea, Mark, Leimbach, Wayne, Lee, Daniel, Lalonde, Thomas, Skinner, William, Villa, Augusto, Liberman, Henry, Younis, George, de Silva, Ranil, Diaz, Miguel, Tami, Luis, Hodgson, John, Raveendran, Ganesh, Goswami, Nilesh, Arias, Jose, Lovitz, Lawrence, Carida II, Robert, Potluri, Srinivasa, Prati, Francesco, Erglis, Andrejs, Pop, Andrei, McEntegart, Margaret, Hudec, Martin, Rangasetty, Umamahesh, Newby, David·2019·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) intravascular ultrasound imaging can detect lipid-rich plaques (LRPs). LRPs are associated with acute coronary syndromes or myocardial infarction, which can result in revascularisation or cardiac death. In this study, we aimed to establish the relationship between LRPs detected by NIRS-intravascular ultrasound imaging at unstented sites and subsequent coronary events from new culprit lesions. METHODS In this prospective, cohort study (LRP), patients from 44 medical centres were enrolled in Italy, Latvia, Netherlands, Slovakia, UK, and the USA. Patients with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent cardiac catheterisation with possible ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention were eligible to be enrolled. Enrolled patients underwent scanning of non-culprit segments using NIRS-intravascular ultrasound imaging. The study had two hierarchal primary hypotheses, patient and plaque, each testing the association between maximum 4 mm Lipid Core Burden Index (maxLCBI4mm) and non-culprit major adverse cardiovascular events (NC-MACE). Enrolled patients with large LRPs (≥250 maxLCBI4mm) and a randomly selected half of patients with small LRPs (<250 maxLCBI4mm) were followed up for 24 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02033694. FINDINGS Between Feb 21, 2014, and March 30, 2016, 1563 patients were enrolled. NIRS-intravascular ultrasound device-related events were seen in six (0·4%) patients. 1271 patients (mean age 64 years, SD 10, 883 [69%] men, 388 [31%]women) with analysable maxLCBI4mm were allocated to follow-up. The 2-year cumulative incidence of NC-MACE was 9% (n=103). Both hierarchical primary hypotheses were met. On a patient level, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for NC-MACE was 1·21 (95% CI 1·09-1·35; p=0·0004) for each 100-unit increase maxLCBI4mm) and adjusted HR 1·18 (1·05-1·32; p=0·0043). In patients with a maxLCBI4mm more than 400, the unadjusted HR for NC-MACE was 2·18 (1·48-3·22; p<0·0001) and adjusted HR was 1·89 (1·26-2·83; p=0·0021). At the plaque level, the unadjusted HR was 1·45 (1·30-1·60; p<0·0001) for each 100-unit increase in maxLCBI4mm. For segments with a maxLCBI4mm more than 400, the unadjusted HR for NC-MACE was 4·22 (2·39-7·45; p<0·0001) and adjusted HR was 3·39 (1·85-6·20; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION NIRS imaging of non-obstructive territories in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation and possible percutaneous coronary intervention was safe and can aid in identifying patients and segments at higher risk for subsequent NC-MACE. NIRS-intravascular ultrasound imaging adds to the armamentarium as the first diagnostic tool able to detect vulnerable patients and plaques in clinical practice. FUNDING Infraredx.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31794-5

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Waksman, R., Di Mario, C., Torguson, R., Ali, Z. A., Singh, V., Skinner, W. H., Artis, A. K., Cate, T. T., Powers, E., Kim, C., Regar, E., Wong, S. C., Lewis, S., Wykrzykowska, J., Dube, S., Kazziha, S., van der Ent, M., Shah, P., Craig, P. E., Zou, Q., Kolm, P., Brewer, H. B., Garcia-Garcia, H. M., Samady, H., Tobis, J., Zainea, M., Leimbach, W., Lee, D., Lalonde, T., Skinner, W., Villa, A., Liberman, H., Younis, G., de Silva, R., Diaz, M., Tami, L., Hodgson, J., Raveendran, G., Goswami, N., Arias, J., Lovitz, L., Carida II, R., Potluri, S., Prati, F., Erglis, A., Pop, A., McEntegart, M., Hudec, M., Rangasetty, U., & Newby, D.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
394
Issue
10209
Pages
1629-1637
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2975198649
Cited by
428
References
27
FWCI
42.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of patients and plaques vulnerable to future coronary events with near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging: a prospective, cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31794-5
The paper
Waksman, R., Di Mario, C., Torguson, R., Ali, Z. A., Singh, V., Skinner, W. H., Artis, A. K., Cate, T. T., Powers, E., Kim, C., Regar, E., Wong, S. C., Lewis, S., Wykrzykowska, J., Dube, S., Kazziha, S., van der Ent, M., Shah, P., Craig, P. E., . . . Newby, D. (2019). Identification of patients and plaques vulnerable to future coronary events with near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging: a prospective, cohort study. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31794-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.