The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unified approach to loneliness
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., & Thisted, R. A. (2010) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0017216 · Cited by 1,757
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Ernst, M., Niederer, D., Werner, A. M., Czaja, S. J., Mikton, C., Ong, A. D., Rosen, T., Brähler, E., & Beutel, M. E. (2022) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0001005 · Cited by 584
Holt‐Lunstad, J. (2022) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-110732 · Cited by 642
Christiansen, J., Qualter, P., Friis, K., Pedersen, S., Lund, R., Andersen, C., Bekker-Jeppesen, M., & Lasgaard, M. (2021) · Perspectives in Public Health · doi:10.1177/17579139211016077 · Cited by 241
Social isolation: an underappreciated determinant of physical health
Holt-Lunstad, J., & Steptoe, A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.012 · Cited by 216
Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors: The Power of Social Connection in Prevention
Holt‐Lunstad, J. (2021) · American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine · doi:10.1177/15598276211009454 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Fried, L., Prohaska, T., Burholt, V., Burns, A., Golden, J., Hawkley, L., Lawlor, B., Leavey, G., Lubben, J., O'Sullivan, R., Perissinotto, C., van Tilburg, T., Tully, M., & Victor, C.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- University of Ulster (GB)
- St. James's Hospital (IE)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Boston College (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 395
- Issue
- 10218
- Pages
- 114
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2999156461
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.ulster.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Keywords
- loneliness, older adults, social isolation, population aging, mental health, social connectedness
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Health Status, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Models, Psychological, National Academy of Sciences, U.S., Social Isolation, United States, Ageism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review