Cited by 241Health disparities and outcomesCOVID-19 and Mental HealthPsychology and Mental Health

Associations of loneliness and social isolation with physical and mental health among adolescents and young adults

Christiansen, J, Qualter, P, Friis, K, Pedersen, SS, Lund, R, Andersen, CM, Bekker-Jeppesen, M, Lasgaard, M·2021·Perspectives in Public Health

Abstract

Aims: The present study investigates whether loneliness and social isolation are associated with poor physical and mental health among adolescents and young adults, and whether age and gender play a role in the associations of loneliness and social isolation with mental and physical health. Methods: This study used cross-sectional self-report data from the 2017 Danish Health and Morbidity Surveys titled ‘How are you?’ ( N = 19,890, M = 22.6 years). Results: Logistic regression analyses showed that loneliness and social isolation were independently associated with poor physical and mental health. Loneliness was associated with increased odds of asthma, migraine, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, slipped disc/back pain, tinnitus, long-term mental illness, depressive symptomatology, anxiety symptomatology and alcohol problems. Social isolation was associated with decreased odds of having migraine, osteoarthritis and alcohol problems, and an increased risk of long-term mental illness and depressive symptomatology. Small age and gender differences were detected. Conclusions: In adolescents and young adults, loneliness and social isolation were associated with poor mental health and loneliness with poor physical health. These findings highlight the need for targeted prevention and intervention initiatives to alleviate loneliness and social isolation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/17579139211016077

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christiansen, J., Qualter, P., Friis, K., Pedersen, S., Lund, R., Andersen, C., Bekker-Jeppesen, M., & Lasgaard, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Central Denmark Region (DK)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Center for Clinical Research and Prevention (DK)
Venue
Perspectives in Public Health
Published
2021-06-19
Volume
141
Issue
4
Pages
226-236
ISSN
  • 1757-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-9147
OpenAlex
W3173641832
Cited by
241
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1
FWCI
17.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives in Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
loneliness, social isolation, adolescents, young adults, physical health, mental health, depressive symptoms, anxiety, alcohol problems, long-term mental illness, age differences, gender differences, chronic disease
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Status, Humans, Loneliness, Social Isolation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review