Cited by 714COVID-19 and healthcare impactsAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

COVID-19 pandemic and admission rates for and management of acute coronary syndromes in england

Open access
Mafham, Marion M, Spata, Enti, Goldacre, Raphael, Gair, Dominic, Curnow, Paula, Bray, Mark, Hollings, Sam, Roebuck, Chris +12 more·2020·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several countries affected by the COVID-19 pandemic have reported a substantial drop in the number of patients attending the emergency department with acute coronary syndromes and a reduced number of cardiac procedures. We aimed to understand the scale, nature, and duration of changes to admissions for different types of acute coronary syndrome in England and to evaluate whether in-hospital management of patients has been affected as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We analysed data on hospital admissions in England for types of acute coronary syndrome from Jan 1, 2019, to May 24, 2020, that were recorded in the Secondary Uses Service Admitted Patient Care database. Admissions were classified as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), myocardial infarction of unknown type, or other acute coronary syndromes (including unstable angina). We identified revascularisation procedures undertaken during these admissions (ie, coronary angiography without percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], PCI, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery). We calculated the numbers of weekly admissions and procedures undertaken; percentage reductions in weekly admissions and across subgroups were also calculated, with 95% CIs. FINDINGS: Hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome declined from mid-February, 2020, falling from a 2019 baseline rate of 3017 admissions per week to 1813 per week by the end of March, 2020, a reduction of 40% (95% CI 37-43). This decline was partly reversed during April and May, 2020, such that by the last week of May, 2020, there were 2522 admissions, representing a 16% (95% CI 13-20) reduction from baseline. During the period of declining admissions, there were reductions in the numbers of admissions for all types of acute coronary syndrome, including both STEMI and NSTEMI, but relative and absolute reductions were larger for NSTEMI, with 1267 admissions per week in 2019 and 733 per week by the end of March, 2020, a percent reduction of 42% (95% CI 38-46). In parallel, reductions were recorded in the number of PCI procedures for patients with both STEMI (438 PCI procedures per week in 2019 vs 346 by the end of March, 2020; percent reduction 21%, 95% CI 12-29) and NSTEMI (383 PCI procedures per week in 2019 vs 240 by the end of March, 2020; percent reduction 37%, 29-45). The median length of stay among patients with acute coronary syndrome fell from 4 days (IQR 2-9) in 2019 to 3 days (1-5) by the end of March, 2020. INTERPRETATION: Compared with the weekly average in 2019, there was a substantial reduction in the weekly numbers of patients with acute coronary syndrome who were admitted to hospital in England by the end of March, 2020, which had been partly reversed by the end of May, 2020. The reduced number of admissions during this period is likely to have resulted in increases in out-of-hospital deaths and long-term complications of myocardial infarction and missed opportunities to offer secondary prevention treatment for patients with coronary heart disease. The full extent of the effect of COVID-19 on the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome will continue to be assessed by updating these analyses. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Public Health England, Health Data Research UK, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31356-8

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Public health interventions, limited medical care, and behavioral changes could have contributed to the surge in excess deaths unrelated to COVID-19 in young adults, resulting in a notable peak of mortality in summer 2020.

    “Public health interventions, limited medical care, and behavioral changes (e.g., delays in seeking timely medical help due to fear of infection) (Bollmann et al., 2020; Kansagra et al., 2020; Mafham et al., 2020; Woolf et al., 2021) could have contributed to the surge in excess deaths unrelated to COVID-19 in young adults, resulting in a notable peak of mortality in summer 2020.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mafham, M. M., Spata, E., Goldacre, R., Gair, D., Curnow, P., Bray, M., Hollings, S., Roebuck, C., Gale, C. P., Mamas, M. A., Deanfield, J. E., de Belder, M. A., Luescher, T. F., Denwood, T., Landray, M. J., Emberson, J. R., Collins, R., Morris, E. J. A., Casadei, B., & Baigent, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • NHS Digital (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Keele University (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Baigent, Colin
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
396
Issue
10248
Pages
381-389
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3042916948
Cited by
714
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 295 · 2020: 69
FWCI
54.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (CH/1996001/9454, CH/12/3/29609, RG/16/12/32451)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00017/3, MC_PC_20062)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, acute coronary syndrome, hospitalization, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary angiography, coronary artery bypass grafting, revascularization, emergency department visits, cardiac procedures, England
MeSH terms
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, Betacoronavirus, Facilities and Services Utilization, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angina, Unstable, England, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Revascularization, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review