Cited by 14Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Immunotherapeutic advances in glioma management: The rise of vaccine‐based approaches

Open access
Andrew Awuah, Wireko, Shah, Muhammad Hamza, Tan, Joecelyn Kirani, Ranganathan, Sruthi, Sanker, Vivek, Darko, Kwadwo, Tenkorang, Pearl Ohenewaa, Adageba, Bryan Badayelba +6 more·2024·CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: Gliomas, particularly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are highly aggressive brain tumors that present significant challenges in oncology due to their rapid progression and resistance to conventional therapies. Despite advancements in treatment, the prognosis for patients with GBM remains poor, necessitating the exploration of novel therapeutic approaches. One such emerging strategy is the development of glioma vaccines, which aim to stimulate the immune system to target and destroy tumor cells. Aims: This review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current landscape of glioma vaccine development, analyzing the types of vaccines under investigation, the outcomes of clinical trials, and the challenges and opportunities associated with their implementation. The goal is to highlight the potential of glioma vaccines in advancing more effective and personalized treatments for glioma patients. Materials and Methods: This narrative review systematically assessed the role of glioma vaccines by including full‐text articles published between 2000 and 2024 in English. Databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched using key terms like “glioma,” “brain tumor,” “glioblastoma,” “vaccine,” and “immunotherapy.” The review incorporated both pre‐clinical and clinical studies, including descriptive studies, animal‐model studies, cohort studies, and observational studies. Exclusion criteria were applied to omit abstracts, case reports, posters, and non‐peer‐reviewed studies, ensuring the inclusion of high‐quality evidence. Results: Clinical trials investigating various glioma vaccines, including peptide‐based, DNA/RNA‐based, whole‐cell, and dendritic‐cell vaccines, have shown promising results. These vaccines demonstrated potential in extending survival rates and managing adverse events in glioma patients. However, significant challenges remain, such as therapeutic resistance due to tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion mechanisms. Moreover, the lack of standardized guidelines for evaluating vaccine responses and issues related to ethical considerations, regulatory hurdles, and vaccine acceptance among patients further complicate the implementation of glioma vaccines. Discussion: Addressing the challenges associated with glioma vaccines involves exploring combination therapies, targeted approaches, and personalized medicine. Combining vaccines with traditional therapies like radiotherapy or chemotherapy may enhance efficacy by boosting the immune system’s ability to fight tumor cells. Personalized vaccines tailored to individual patient profiles present an opportunity for improved outcomes. Furthermore, global collaboration and equitable distribution are critical for ensuring access to glioma vaccines, especially in low‐ and middle‐income countries with limited healthcare resources Conclusion: Glioma vaccines represent a promising avenue in the fight against gliomas, offering hope for improving patient outcomes in a disease that is notoriously difficult to treat. Despite the challenges, continued research and the development of innovative strategies, including combination therapies and personalized approaches, are essential for overcoming current barriers and transforming the treatment landscape for glioma patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cns.70013

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antigen-based immunotherapies are designed to induce cytotoxic T-cell responses against antigens expressed by the tumour, such as TAAs over-expressed in tumours compared with healthy tissue, resulting in tumour cell death.

    “Antigen-based immunotherapies are designed to induce cytotoxic T-cell responses against antigens expressed by the tumour, for example, tumour-associated antigens (TAAs) that are over-expressed in tumours compared with healthy tissue, resulting in tumour cell death [8, 11].”

    From Preclinical development of an mRNA-based multiepitope immunotherapeutic for glioblastoma (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Glioma Vaccines section says antigen-based vaccines activate cytotoxic CD8+ T cells that can kill tumour cells presenting the targeted antigen. It also identifies tumour-associated antigens as vaccine targets. Our copy does not establish the claim that those antigens are over-expressed in tumours compared with healthy tissue. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrew Awuah, W., Shah, M. H., Tan, J. K., Ranganathan, S., Sanker, V., Darko, K., Tenkorang, P. O., Adageba, B. B., Ahluwalia, A., Shet, V., Aderinto, N., Kundu, M., Abdul‐Rahman, T., & Atallah, O.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Medicine Sumy State University Sumy Ukraine
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Department of Neurosurgery Trivandrum Medical College Trivandrum Kerala India
  • Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (GH)
  • University of Ghana (GH)
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
  • Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute (IN)
  • Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital (NG)
  • Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital (IN)
  • Sumy State University (UA)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Shah, Muhammad Hamza
Venue
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-08-30
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
e70013-e70013
ISSN
  • 1755-5930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-5949
OpenAlex
W4402095304
Cited by
14
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
glioblastoma, cancer immunotherapy, dendritic cell vaccine, whole-cell vaccine, peptide vaccine, tumor heterogeneity, immune evasion, combination therapy, personalized medicine, vaccine access, clinical trial results, survival outcomes, adverse events, low- and middle-income countries, brain tumors
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Neoplasms, Glioma, Humans, Immunotherapy, Cancer Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review