CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,345Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low back pain

Open access
Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick, Candido, Kenneth D, Vlaeyen, Johan W S, Van Zundert, Jan, Cohen, Steven P·2021·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00733-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Low back pain covers a spectrum of different types of pain (eg, nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic, or non-specific) that frequently overlap. The elements comprising the lumbar spine (eg, soft tissue, vertebrae, zygapophyseal and sacroiliac joints, intervertebral discs, and neurovascular structures) are prone to different stressors, and each of these, alone or in combination, can contribute to low back pain. Due to numerous factors related to low back pain, and the low specificity of imaging and diagnostic injections, diagnostic methods for this condition continue to be a subject of controversy. The biopsychosocial model posits low back pain to be a dynamic interaction between social, psychological, and biological factors that can both predispose to and result from injury, and should be considered when devising interdisciplinary treatment plans. Prevention of low back pain is recognised as a pivotal challenge in high-risk populations to help tackle high health-care costs related to therapy and rehabilitation. To a large extent, therapy depends on pain classification, and usually starts with self-care and pharmacotherapy in combination with non-pharmacological methods, such as physical therapies and psychological treatments in appropriate patients. For refractory low back pain, a wide range of non-surgical (eg, epidural steroid injections and spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain, and radiofrequency ablation and intra-articular steroid injections for mechanical pain) and surgical (eg, decompression for neuropathic pain, disc replacement, and fusion for mechanical causes) treatment options are available in carefully selected patients. Most treatment options address only single, solitary causes and given the complex nature of low back pain, a multimodal interdisciplinary approach is necessary. Although globally recognised as an important health and socioeconomic challenge with an expected increase in prevalence, low back pain continues to have tremendous potential for improvement in both diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Future research on low back pain should focus on improving the accuracy and objectivity of diagnostic assessments, and devising treatment algorithms that consider unique biological, psychological, and social factors. High-quality comparative-effectiveness and randomised controlled trials with longer follow-up periods that aim to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of low back pain management are warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00733-9

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jordan, 2011, Herniated lumbar disc, BMJ Clin Evid, 2011
  2. Huang, 2016, Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Medicine, 95

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,345

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Knezevic, N. N., Candido, K. D., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Van Zundert, J., & Cohen, S. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
398
Issue
10294
Pages
78-92
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00733-9
OpenAlex
W4211136641
Cited by
1,345
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 274 · 2025: 380 · 2024: 317 · 2023: 239 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 22
FWCI
21.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
low back pain, pain classification, biopsychosocial model, diagnostic imaging, diagnostic injection, epidural steroid injection, spinal cord stimulation, radiofrequency ablation, intervertebral disc degeneration, sacroiliac joint, facet joints, neuropathic pain, nociplastic pain, non-specific low back pain, pain prevention, interdisciplinary treatment, pharmacotherapy, physiotherapy, psychological intervention, spinal decompression, disc replacement, spinal fusion, treatment algorithm, comparative effectiveness
MeSH terms
Humans, Risk Factors, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review