Cited by 210Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Costs Associated With Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: An Analysis of the UK General Practice Research Database

Hong, Jihyung, Reed, Catherine, Novick, Diego, Happich, Michael·2013·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of health care costs associated with the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP) in the United Kingdom. OBJECTIVE: To assess 12-month health care costs associated with the treatment of CLBP, using the UK General Practice Research Database. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CLBP is a common health problem. METHODS: Data were obtained from the General Practice Research Database, a computerized database of UK primary care patient data. Patients with CLBP were identified for the study period (January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009) using diagnostic records and pain relief prescriptions (n = 64,167), and 1:1 matched to patients without CLBP (n = 52,986) on the basis of age, sex, and general practitioner's practice. Index date was defined as the first date of CLBP record; the same index date was assigned to matched controls. Multivariate analyses were performed to compare resource use costs (2009 values) in the 12 months after the index date between patients with and without CLBP. A sensitivity analysis was carried out with a more stringent definition for the control group by excluding a broad range of pain conditions. RESULTS: Total health care costs for patients with CLBP were double those of the matched controls (£1074 vs. £516; P < 0.05). Of the cost difference, 58.8% was accounted for by general practitioner's consultations, 22.3% by referrals to secondary care, and the rest by pain relief medications. The sensitivity analysis revealed an even greater cost difference between the 2 groups (£1052 vs. £304; P < 0.05). Because of the use of a retrospective administrative claims database, this study is subject to selection bias between study cohorts, misidentification of comorbidities, and an inability to confirm adherence to therapy or assess indirect costs and costs of over-the-counter medications. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm the substantial economic burden of CLBP, even with direct costs only.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0b013e318276450f

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, J., Reed, C., Novick, D., & Happich, M.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • Eli Lilly (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Hong, Jihyung
Venue
Spine
Published
2013-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
75-82
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039594564
Cited by
210
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
chronic low back pain, health care costs, economic burden, primary care visits, secondary care referral, resource utilization (health care), United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, Health Care Costs, Low Back Pain, Young Adult, General Practice, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review