Cited by 17Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Minimum effective low dose of antithymocyte globulin in people aged 5–25 years with recent-onset stage 3 type 1 diabetes (MELD-ATG): a phase 2, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, adaptive dose-ranging trial

Open access
Mathieu, Chantal, Wych, Julie, Hendriks, A Emile J, Van Ryckeghem, Lisa, Tree, Timothy, Chmura, Piotr, Möller, Christopher, Casteels, Kristina +75 more·2025·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Type 1 diabetes remains an important health-care problem, with no disease-modifying therapies available in people with recent-onset, clinical type 1 diabetes. Adaptive trial designs, allowing faster evaluation of treatment modalities, remain underexplored in this stage of the disease. We aimed to identify the minimum effective dose of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in people aged 5-25 years with recent-onset, clinical type 1 diabetes. Methods MELD-ATG was a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multi-arm, adaptive dose-ranging, parallel-cohort trial done in 14 accredited trial centres in eight countries (the UK, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Italy, Belgium, Austria, and Slovenia). Participants aged 5-25 years, diagnosed with clinical, stage 3 type 1 diabetes 3-9 weeks before treatment, with random C-peptide concentrations 0·2 nmol/L or more and at least one diabetes-related autoantibody (GADA, IA-2A, or ZnT8) were randomly assigned by a web-based randomisation system into seven consecutive cohorts receiving placebo, 2·5 mg/kg ATG, 1·5 mg/kg ATG, 0·5 mg/kg ATG, or 0·1 mg/kg ATG. Participants in cohort 1 were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1:1, participants in cohorts 2 and 3 were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1, and participants in cohorts 4-7 were randomly assigned 1:1:1. All cohorts included one placebo group and one 2·5 mg/kg ATG group. The other groups were assigned to ATG doses that were determined based on accruing data and the decision of the dose determining committee. The trial cohorts were stratified by age group (5-9 years, 10-17 years, and 18-25 years) with block sizes varying by cohort. Concealment lists, outlining the treatment allocation, were only available for the pharmacists; participants and study teams were masked to treatment allocation. ATG was administered by an intravenous infusion over 2 consecutive days. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the stimulated C-peptide concentration during a 2-h mixed-meal tolerance test at 12 months measured as ln(AUC C-peptide + 1). Conditional on finding a statistically significant difference at p<0·05 for 2·5 mg/kg ATG versus placebo, the minimum effective dose of ATG was determined. All randomly assigned participants were included in the primary analysis. All participants who received the study drug were included in the safety analysis. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04509791) and is completed. Findings Between Nov 24, 2020, and Dec 13, 2023, 152 people were recruited and screened, 117 of whom were randomly assigned (placebo n=31, 0·1 mg/kg ATG n=6, 0·5 mg/kg ATG n=35, 1·5 mg/kg ATG n=12, and 2·5 mg/kg n=33). 54 (46%) of 117 participants were male and 63 (54%) were female. Participants were mainly European. The 0·1 mg/kg dose and the 1·5 mg/kg dose were progressively dropped from the study. At 12 months, the mean ln(AUC C-peptide + 1) was 0·411 nmol/L per min (SD 0·032) in the placebo group and 0·535 nmol/L per min (0·032) in the 2·5 mg/kg ATG group. The mean difference in the ln(AUC C-peptide + 1) between 2·5 mg/kg ATG and placebo was 0·124 nmol/L per min (95% CI 0·043-0·205; p=0·0028). At 12 months, the mean ln(AUC C-peptide + 1) in the 0·5 mg/kg ATG group, the remaining middle dose, was 0·513 nmol/L per min (SD 0·032), with a mean baseline-adjusted difference from placebo of 0·102 nmol/L per min (95% CI 0·021-0·183; p=0·014). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 11 (33%) of 33 participants in the 2·5 mg/kg ATG group, eight (24%) of 34 in the 0·5mg/kg ATG group, and no participants in the placebo group. Serum sickness occurred in 27 (82%) participants in the 2·5 mg/kg ATG group, 11 (32%) in the 0·5 mg/kg ATG group, and no participants in the placebo group. There were no deaths related to adverse events. Interpretation In young people with recent-onset, clinical type 1 diabetes, 2·5 mg/kg and 0·5 mg/kg ATG reduced loss of β-cell function, showing the potential of an affordable, repurposed agent, ATG, in a low and safe dose, as a disease-modifying agent in this population. Funding The European Union's Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking INNODIA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01674-5

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A very recent trial assessing the efficacy and safety of low-dose ATG showed that β-cell function can be preserved with doses lower than previously considered effective and that the therapy is safe in children 5 years or older.

    “A very recent trial assessing the efficacy and safety of lowdose ATG showed that βcell function can be preserved with doses lower than previously considered effective and that the therapy is safe in children 5 years or older.22”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathieu, C., Wych, J., Hendriks, A. E. J., Van Ryckeghem, L., Tree, T., Chmura, P., Möller, C., Casteels, K., Danne, T., Reschke, F., Šmigoc Schweiger, D., Battelino, T., Johannesen, J., Rami-Merhar, B., Pieber, T., De Block, C., Evans, M., Hilbrands, R., Bosi, E., Willemsen, R. H., Basu, S., Pulkkinen, M.-A., Knip, M., Cnop, M., Nitsche, A., Schulte, A. M., Niemöller, E., Peakman, M., Wilhelm-Benartzi, C., Gillespie, D., Overbergh, L., Mander, A. P., Marcovecchio, M. L., Mathieu, C., Overbergh, L., Evans, M., Hendriks, A. E. J., Marcovecchio, M. L., Peakman, M., Tree, T., Morgan, N. G., Todd, J. A., Wicker, L., Mander, A. P., Dayan, C. M., Wych, J., Gillespie, D., Pieber, T., Eizirik, D. L., Cnop, M., Brunak, S., Pociot, F., Johannesen, J., Mallone, R., Knip, M., Otonkoski, T., Veijola, R., Lahesmaa, R., Ziegler, A. G., Solimena, M., Bonifacio, E., Holl, R., Dotta, F., Chiarelli, F., Marchetti, P., Bosi, E., Cianfarani, S., de Beaufort, C., Dahl-Jørgensen, K., Jarosz-Chobot, P., Battelino, T., Gotthardt, M., Roep, B. O., Lundgren, M., Costecalde, G., von Herrath, M., Napolitano-Rosen, A., Niemöller, E., Keil, S., Dutta, S., Latres, E., Agiostratidou, G., & Koralova, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult (DE)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Sanofi (Germany) (DE)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-09
Volume
406
Issue
10510
Pages
1375-1388
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4414400011
Cited by
17
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 5
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • dCOBISS.SI Digital Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  • University of Cambridge
  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, KU Leuven
  • European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • JDRF
  • IMI
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative (115797)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
antithymocyte globulin, type 1 diabetes, recent-onset type 1 diabetes, minimum effective dose, C-peptide, beta-cell function, mixed meal tolerance test, children and adolescents, disease-modifying therapy, immunomodulatory therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antilymphocyte Serum, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review