Cited by 199Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityHIV/AIDS oral health manifestationsHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment

COMPARISON OF FLUCONAZOLE AND KETOCONAZOLE FOR OROPHARYNGEAL CANDIDIASIS IN AIDS

De Wit, S., Goossens, H., Weerts, D., Clumeck, N.·1989·The Lancet

Abstract

In a randomised, double-blind study the efficacy and toxicity of oral fluconazole 50 mg daily and ketoconazole 200 mg daily were compared for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and AIDS-related complex (ARC). 20 episodes (18 patients) were treated with fluconazole and 20 episodes (19 patients) with ketoconazole. Pretreatment clinical features and laboratory test results were similar in both groups. 17 episodes (85%) in the fluconazole group and 16 (80%) in the ketoconazole group could be evaluated. There was clinical cure at the end of therapy in all fluconazole-treated and 12 of 16 (75%) ketoconazole-treated episodes. Cultures were negative at the end of therapy in 87% of the fluconazole group and 69% of the ketoconazole group. 1 patients stopped taking fluconazole because of severe nausea. 1 of 18 fluconazole-treated and 4 of 19 ketoconazole-treated patients had transient rises in alanine or aspartate aminotransferase. Fluconazole seemed more effective than ketoconazole in the treatment of oral thrush among AIDS and ARC patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92572-5

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluconazole is superior to ketoconazole for oropharyngeal candidiasis.

    “Fluconazole is superior to ketoconazole [253].”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [253]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Wit, S., Goossens, H., Weerts, D., & Clumeck, N.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre (BE)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-04
Volume
333
Issue
8641
Pages
746-748
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1978615086
Cited by
199
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
21.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Keywords
fluconazole, ketoconazole, oropharyngeal candidiasis, AIDS, AIDS-related complex, oral candidiasis, antifungal efficacy, drug toxicity, nausea
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, AIDS-Related Complex, Candidiasis, Oral, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Ketoconazole, Male, Middle Aged, Oropharynx, Pharyngeal Diseases, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Triazoles, Fluconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review