The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation
Abstract
Background Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 currently relies on assessment of risk followed by invasive testing in the 5% of pregnancies at the highest estimated risk. Selection of the high-risk group by a combination of maternal age and second-trimester maternal serum biochemistry gives a detection rate of about 60%. We investigated assessment of risk by a combination of maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness, measured by ultrasonography at 10-14 weeks of gestation.Methods The risk of trisomy 21 was estimated for 96127 women of median age 31 years (range 14-49) with singleton pregnancies. Ultrasonography was done by 306 appropriately trained sonographers in 22 centres. Risk of trisomy 21 was calculated from the maternal age and gestational-age-related prevalence, multiplied by a likelihood ratio depending on the deviation from normal in nuchal-translucency thickness for crown-rump length. The distribution of risks was investigated and the sensitivity of a cut-off risk of 1 in 300 was calculated. Phenotype was assessed by fetal karyotyping or clinical examination of liveborn infants.Findings The estimated trisomy-21 risk, from maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness, was 1 in 300 or higher in 7907 (8.3%) of 95476 normal pregnancies, 268 (82-2%) of 326 with trisomy 21, and 253 (77.9%) of 325 with other chromosomal defects. The 5% of the study population with the highest estimated risk included 77% of trisomy-21 cases.Interpretation Selection of the high-risk group for invasive testing by this method allows the detection of about 80% of affected pregnancies. However, even this method of risk assessment requires about 30 invasive tests for identification of one affected fetus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Combining clinical information (maternal age and serum parameters) with sonographic assessment of fetal characteristics, predominantly the assessment of nuchal translucency (NT), is recommended practice [131].”
In the citing paper
“According to a large study of almost 10,000 women, the NT was above the 95th centile in 82.2% of fetuses with trisomy 21 and 77.9% with other chromosomal defects, therefore presenting as a valuable marker for identification of fetal abnormalities [45].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, the CRL of the examined fetus should be between 45 mm and 84 mm according to the protocol described by Nicolaides et al. [45].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, the NT in combination with maternal age has a sensitivity of 82.2% and a negative predictive value of 99.9% [45].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
Nicolaides, K. H., Azar, G. B., Byrne, D. L., Mansur, C. A., & Marks, K. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6831.867 · Cited by 1,051
Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.
Wald, N. J., Cuckle, H., Densem, J. W., Nanchahal, K., Royston, P. J., Chard, T., Haddow, J. E., Knight, G. J., Palomaki, G. E., & Canick, J. A. (1988) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.297.6653.883 · Cited by 959
The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies
Sebire, N. J., Snijders, R. J. M., Hughes, K., Sepúlveda, W., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1997) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10948.x · Cited by 627
Pandya, P. P., Snijders, R. J. M., Johnson, S. P., Brizot, M. D. L., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1995) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10902.x · Cited by 409
The lambda sign at 10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of chorionicity in twin pregnancies
Sepúlveda, W., Sebire, N. J., Hughes, K., Odibo, A. O., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1996) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07060421.x · Cited by 357
Nicolaides, K. H., Brizot, M. D. L., & Snijders, R. J. M. (1994) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11946.x · Cited by 353
Maternal Age and Gestational Age-Specific Risk for Chromosomal Defects
Snijders, R. J. M., Sebire, N. J., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000264259 · Cited by 278
Increased nuchal translucency at 10—14 weeks of gestation as a marker for major cardiac defects
Hyett, J. A., Perdu, M., Sharland, G. K., Snijders, R. J. M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1997) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10040242.x · Cited by 234
Chromosomal defects and outcome in 1015 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency
Pandya, P. P., Kondylios, A., Hilbert, L., Snijders, R. J. M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1995) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05010015.x · Cited by 231
Sebire, N. J., Snijders, R. J. M., Hughes, K., Sepúlveda, W., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1996) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09550.x · Cited by 219
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Nuchal translucency in pregnancies conceived after assisted reproduction technology
Hui, P. W., Lee, C. P., Tang, M. H. Y., & Ho, P. C. (2006) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.gco.0000193005.42910.35 · Cited by 8
Biochemical screening for aneuploidy
Evans, M. I., & Cuckle, H. (2007) · Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1586/17474108.2.6.765 · Cited by 8
First-Trimester Down Syndrome Screening: Component Analytes and Timing for Optimal Performance
Wenstrom, K. D. (2005) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2005.06.002 · Cited by 8
Ludwig, M. Z., Geipel, A., Berg, C., Gembruch, U., SCHWINGER, E., & Diedrich, K. (2001) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000053885 · Cited by 8
“…NT at 10– 14 weeks of gestation, this approach allows the selection of fetuses with a high risk for chromosomal aberrations, genetic syndromes or structural abnormalities such as major defects of the heart and great arteries [Hyett et al., 1999; Snijders et al., 1998; Souka and Nicolaides, 1997].”
BackgroundMethodRatio of nuchal thickness to humerus length for Down syndrome detection
Bahado-Singh, R. O., Öz, U., Hsu, C. D., Deren, Ö., Copel, J. A., & Mahoney, M. J. (2001) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2001.113878 · Cited by 8
Impact of First-Trimester Aneuploidy Screening in a High-Risk Population
Nadel, A. S., & Likhite, M. L. (2009) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000236356 · Cited by 8
Screening for Chromosomal Anomalies: First or Second Trimester, Biochemical or Ultrasound?
Stojilkovic-Mikic, T., & Rodeck, C. H. (2003) · Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore · doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v32n5p583 · Cited by 8
Role of ultrasound in obstetrics
Vankayalapati, P., & Hollis, B. (2004) · Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.curobgyn.2003.12.001 · Cited by 8
Crespo, J. M. M., Río, M. D., Gómez, O., BORRELL, A., Puerto, B., Cararach, V., & Fortuny, A. (2003) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.119 · Cited by 8
First trimester screening and Down syndrome
Marttala, J. (2011) · Cited by 8
First Trimester Tricuspid Regurgitation: Clinical Significance
Teixeira, S., & Guedes‐Martins, L. (2022) · Current Cardiology Reviews · doi:10.2174/1573403x19666221206115642 · Cited by 7
“In less than two decades, first-trimester ultrasound has evolved from a test limited to ensuring fetal viability, location of the pregnancy, and gestational age [84, 85] to one of the most critical tests during this period [86].”
BackgroundNuchal Translucency and Congenital Heart Defects
Sofia-Gonçalves, A., & Guedes‐Martins, L. (2024) · Current Cardiology Reviews · doi:10.2174/011573403x264963231128045500 · Cited by 7
Valbuena, H., Ramis, J., Sagalá, J., Sánchez‐Durán, M. Á., & Aulesa, C. (2014) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/jog.12490 · Cited by 7
New ultrasonographic markers of aneuploidies: nasal bones
Monni, G., & Zoppi, M. A. (2002) · The ultrasound review of obstetrics & gynecology/Ultrasound review of obstetrics and gynecology · doi:10.1080/14722240208500480 · Cited by 7
Äyräs, O., Eronen, M., Tikkanen, M., Rahkola‐Soisalo, P., Paavonen, J. A., & Stefanović, V. (2016) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.12878 · Cited by 7
O’Brien, B. M., Halliday, J. V., Lambert-Messerlian, G. M., Eklund, E. E., Kloza, E. M., & Palomaki, G. E. (2017) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.5010 · Cited by 7
“Nuchal translucency measurements of 3mm or greater (above the 95 centile at 13weeks of gestation) and cystic hygroma are considered abnormal and are associated with an increased risk of aneuploidy and other abnormalities.(4) A cystic hygroma is defined as a septated fluid filled cavity in the nuchal region that may ex…”
BackgroundCoello-Cahuao, E., Sánchez‐Durán, M. Á., Calero, I., Higueras, T., García, M. A., Rodó, C., Maíz, N., Plaja, A., Castells, N., Mediano, C., et al. (2022) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06564-7 · Cited by 7
Eckmann-Scholz, C., Salmassi, A., Jonat, W., & Alkatout, İ. (2013) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.809416 · Cited by 7
Is the yolk sac a new marker for chromosomal abnormalities in early pregnancy?
Schmidt, P. M., Hörmansdörfer, C., Bosselmann, S., Elsässer, M., & Scharf, A. (2010) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1696-6 · Cited by 7
“Currently a similar and successful concept applies to the measurement of nuchal translucency in first trimester screening [28, 29].”
BackgroundHörmansdörfer, C., Golatta, M., Scharf, A., Hillemanns, P., & Schmidt, P. (2010) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1452-y · Cited by 7
Lawrence, K., & Crowther, C. A. (2003) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00071.x · Cited by 7
Short-Rib-Polydactyly Syndrome Presenting with Increased Nuchal Translucency in a High-Risk Family
Daskalakis, G., Souka, A. P., Kavalakis, I., Haritos, T., Basayiannis, C., Antsaklis, P. G., & Antsaklis, A. (2006) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000093879 · Cited by 7
“Short-rib-polydactyly syndrome (SRPS) represents a group of rare, lethal skeletal dysplasias characterized by pulmonary hypoplasia, short ribs, short limbs, polydactyly, and visceral abnormalities. An increased fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 11–14 weeks of gestation has been associated with chromosomal abnorma…”
BackgroundHerman, A., Dreazen, E., Tovbin, Y., Reish, O., Bukovsky, I., & Maymon, R. (2003) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000069377 · Cited by 7
Akolekar, R., Cruz, J. D. J., Penco, J. M. P., Zhou, Y., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2010) · Hypertension in Pregnancy · doi:10.3109/10641950903242675 · Cited by 7
“(29,30) We record maternal characteristics and medical history, measure the uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) by transabdominal colour Doppler (15), and store serum and plasma at −80°C for subsequent biochemical analysis.”
MethodLai, K. W., Hum, Y. C., & Supriyanto, E. (2011) · International Journal of the Physical Sciences · doi:10.5897/ijps11.848 · Cited by 7
Two Hundred Years of Progress in the Practice of Midwifery
Greene, M. F. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1209764 · Cited by 7
Wójtowicz, A., Wójtowicz, W., Jurek, J., & Huras, H. K. (2018) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.5251 · Cited by 7
TEKESIN, I. (2018) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2018-0145 · Cited by 7
Panaitescu, A. M. (2019) · Acta Endocrinologica (Bucharest) · doi:10.4183/aeb.2019.323 · Cited by 7
How genomics is changing the practice of prenatal testing
Filges, I., Miny, P., Holzgreve, W., & Tercanli, S. (2021) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2021-0220 · Cited by 8
Spaggiari, E., Czerkiewicz, I., Sault, C., Dreux, S., Galland, A., Salomon, L. J., Ville, Y. G., & MULLER, F. M. (2015) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000442198 · Cited by 7
Down’s syndrome screening at 11–14 weeks' gestation using prenasal thickness and nasal bone length
Manegold‐Brauer, G., Maymon, R., Shor, S., Cuckle, H., Gembruch, U., & Geipel, A. (2019) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-019-05083-2 · Cited by 7
Karslı, M. F., Başer, E., Seçkin, K. D., Yeral, M. İ., Toğrul, C., & Uğur, M. (2013) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.818123 · Cited by 7
“Increased NT has also been linked with fetal lymphatic or venous congestion, anemia, cardiac dysfunction, and congenital infections [28].”
Sieroszewski, P., Perenc, M., Baś-Budecka, E., & Suzin, J. (2006) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf03194619 · Cited by 7
“This finding is confirmed by numerous reports presented in international literature on the crucial role of nuchal translucency measurement as a marker of trisomy 21 (Brambati et al. 1995; Pajkrt et al. 1998; Snijders et al. 1998; Szabo et al. 1990).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEffect of Chorionic Villus Sampling on Uterine Artery Doppler
Khalil, A. A., Akolekar, R., Syngelaki, A., Penco, J. M. P., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2010) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000315295 · Cited by 7
Cribado bioquímico-ecográfico de las aneuploidías en el primer trimestre. Metodología y resultados
Bach, C., Torrent, S. V., Cabrero, D., & Sabrià, J. (2004) · Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología · doi:10.1016/s0304-5013(04)75954-3 · Cited by 7
Ethical dimensions of nuchal translucency screening
Chasen, S. T., & Skupski, D. W. (2003) · Clinics in Perinatology · doi:10.1016/s0095-5108(02)00078-7 · Cited by 7
“[8] Snijders RJM, Noble P, Sebire N, et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe mitral gap at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks: marker of trisomy 21 or artifact?
Maíz, N., Dagklis, T., Huggon, I. C., Allan, L. D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5170 · Cited by 7
First-trimester combined screening: experience with an instant results approach
Norton, M. E., Hopkins, L. M., Pena, S., Krantz, D., & Caughey, A. B. (2007) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.019 · Cited by 7
The First Trimester Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormalities
Twining, P. (2000) · Ultrasound · doi:10.1177/1742271x0000800205 · Cited by 7
Association Between Increased Nuchal Translucency and Second Trimester Cardiac Echogenic Foci
Prefumo, F., Presti, F., Thilaganathan, B., & Carvalho, J. S. (2003) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00006250-200305000-00013 · Cited by 7
Maymon, R., Bergman, M., Segal, S., Dreazen, E., Weinraub, Z., & Herman, A. (2001) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.198 · Cited by 7
Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in assisted reproductive pregnancies
Maymon, R. (1999) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/5.5.530 · Cited by 7
Optimising prenatal diagnosis of Down's syndrome
Neilson, J. P., & Alfirević, Ž. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7539.433 · Cited by 7
Where have all the trisomies gone?
Palomaki, G. E., Lambert-Messerlian, G. M., & Haddow, J. E. (2016) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.046 · Cited by 7
“number of patients as the result of failed tests or the presence of other fetal abnormalities introduces bias in evaluating test performance.(4-6) We whole-heartedly agree with Palomaki et al(7) that “It is critical that groups reporting screening performance of any prenatal test carefully consider the impact of bias…”
Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Abnormalities through Chorionic Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis
BENN, P. A. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119676980.ch11 · Cited by 9
Ars, E., Kruyer, H., Gaona, A., Serra, E., Lázaro, C., & Estivill, X. (1999) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199908)19:8 · Cited by 19
Feresin, A., Stampalija, T., Cappellani, S., Bussani, R., Faletra, F., Murru, F. M., Ulivi, S., Suergiu, S., Savarese, P., Pedicini, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.982508 · Cited by 6
Significance of Sonological Evaluation of Nuchal Translucency and Correlation with Pregnancy Outcome
Malini, K. V., Raksha, M., Vamyanmane, D. K., & Baliga, A. (2018) · Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1692 · Cited by 6
Karki, S., Joshi, K., Tamrakar, S., Regmi, S., & Khanal, K. (2015) · Kathmandu University Medical Journal · doi:10.3126/kumj.v11i4.12522 · Cited by 6
Iuculano, A., Pagani, G. A., Stagnati, V., Floris, M., Ibba, R. M., & Monni, G. (2015) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2015-0157 · Cited by 6
Sciortino, G., Tegolo, D., & Valenti, C. F. (2017) · International Conference on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT) · doi:10.1109/icat.2017.8171631 · Cited by 6
Konstantopoulos, A., Sfakianoudis, K., Simopoulou, M., Kontogeorgi, A., Rapani, A., Grigoriadis, S., Pantou, A., Bathrellos, N., Grammatis, A. L., & Pantos, K. (2020) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics10080531 · Cited by 7
“Both embryos presented with normal Crown Rump Length (CRL) as well as normal nuchal translucency (NT) measurements [33,34].”
BackgroundOutcome of the fetuses with severely increased nuchal translucency thickness in the first trimester
Nakamura, Y. K., Fujita, S., Yamada, K., Song, M., Tajima, A., Matsumoto, J., Kihira, C., 倉田淑恵, Arakawa, H., & Tamura, C. (2020) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/jog.14411 · Cited by 6
“4 46,XY arr(1-22)x2,(XY)x1 38 3728 g None Alive 8.”
Quality control of fetal biometric evaluation and Doppler
Granozio, G., & Napolitano, R. (2021) · Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04795-x · Cited by 6
Miller, K. A., Sagaser, K. G., Hertenstein, C. B., Blakemore, K. J., Forster, K. R., Lawson, C. S., & Jelin, A. C. (2023) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.16190 · Cited by 6
Nuchal translucency screening in monochorionic twin pregnancies
Zoppi, M. A. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.7465 · Cited by 6
The Use of Nuchal Translucency in Contemporary Obstetric Practice
Said, S. A. T., & Malone, F. D. (2008) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0b013e318160f2ea · Cited by 6
“Nuchal Translucency Screening for Other Aneuploidies In the FMF Multicenter screening study for aneuploidy at 10 to 14weeks, 325 cases with chromosomal abnormalities other than Down syndrome were identified.(7) Given that the majority of first-trimester fetuses with these other aneuploidies will die in utero spontaneo…”
BackgroundInfluentialLepage, N., Chaudhry, A., Konforte, D., Shaw, J., Veljkovic, K., Dennis, A., Rashid, S., & Farrell, S. A. (2012) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.06.015 · Cited by 6
Three-dimensional ultrasonography in genetic screening and counselling
Shih, J., Chen, C.-P., & Hsieh, F. (2001) · The ultrasound review of obstetrics & gynecology/Ultrasound review of obstetrics and gynecology · doi:10.1080/14722240108500428 · Cited by 6
Clinical utility of nuchal translucency screening
Stefanović, V., Eronen, M., Paavonen, J. A., Tikkanen, M., & Äyräs, O. (2014) · Research and Reports in Neonatology · doi:10.2147/rrn.s67514 · Cited by 6
Prospective experience with contingent screening strategy for Down syndrome in Estonia
Muru, K., Sitska, M., Asser, K., Ehrenberg, A., Karro, H., Õunap, K., & Reimand, T. (2010) · Journal of Community Genetics · doi:10.1007/s12687-010-0020-2 · Cited by 6
“The use of ultrasound screening and placental markers for DS screening in the first trimester was first proposed by Nicolaides and colleagues in the early 1990s (Nicolaides et al. 1992; Snijders et al. 1998).”
BackgroundPrenatal diagnosis for detection of aneuploidy: the options
Budorick, N. E., & O'Boyle, M. K. (2003) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(03)00044-7 · Cited by 6
“Ultrasound measurement of nuchal translucency has been shown to distinguish normal from abnormal gestations [92–94].”
Backgroundvan Heesch, P. N. A. C. M., Struijk, P. C., Brandenburg, H., Steegers, E. A. P., & Wildschut, H. I. J. (2008) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm.2008.088 · Cited by 6
Lith, J. M. M. V., Benacerraf, B. R., & Yagel, S. (2011) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2681 · Cited by 6
“Subsequently, Kypros Nicolaides and his group observed that measuring nuchal thickness in the first trimester was a valid screening method with a 77% and 5% detection and false-positive rate respectively for detecting DS (Snijders et al., 1998).”
Cuckle, H., Moskovich, M., Vaknin, Z., Levental, S., Rosen, H., & Maymon, R. (2012) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2929 · Cited by 6
Peut-on améliorer le dépistage et le diagnostic des anomalies chromosomiques fœtales ?
Ville, Y. G. (2005) · Bulletin de l Académie Nationale de Médecine · doi:10.1016/s0001-4079(19)33435-1 · Cited by 6
Wilson, R. D., Poon, L. C., & Ghidini, A. (2015) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4719 · Cited by 6
Hamidah, N. H., Munirah, A., Hafiza, A., Farisah, A. R., Shuhaila, A., Mn, N., Jamil, M., & Ainoon, O. (2014) · PubMed · Cited by 6
Boutin, A., Dembickaja, R., Campanero, M., Nicolaides, K. H., & Demers, S. (2018) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1632369 · Cited by 6
First trimester uterine artery pulsatility index levels in euploid and aneuploid pregnancies
Prodan, N., Wagner, P., Sonek, J., Hoopmann, M., Mutz, A., Brucker, S. Y., & Kagan, K. O. (2019) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-019-05328-0 · Cited by 6
Moshonov, R., Hod, K., Azaria, B., Abadi‐Korek, I., Berger, R., & Shohat, M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250734 · Cited by 6
(2013) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-013-1782-6 · Cited by 6
Prenatal genetic diagnosis of Down’s syndrome
Abbott, M., & BENN, P. A. (2002) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1586/14737159.2.6.605 · Cited by 6
Bornstein, E., Gulersen, M., Krantz, D., Cheung, S. W., Maliszewski, K., & Divon, M. Y. (2018) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.5350 · Cited by 6
“The association between abnormal levels of first‐trimester serum analytes and aneuploidy is well established.(1,3,15-17) For instance, in”
BackgroundDépistage de la trisomie 21 : clarté nucale et/ou marqueurs sériques ?
Audibert, F., Dommergues, M., Benattar, C., Taieb, J., Champagne, C., & Frydman, R. (2001) · Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité · doi:10.1016/s1297-9589(01)00192-8 · Cited by 6
Özer, Ö., Sayin, C. N., & Varol, F. G. (2010) · Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association · doi:10.5152/jtgga.2010.36 · Cited by 6
“Screening for Tri21 by combining maternal age, fetal NT thickness and maternal serum f β-HCG and PAPP-A at 11-13 weeks was associated with a detection rate of about 90% for a false-positive rate of 5% (3, 4).”
BackgroundMarsis, I. O. (2004) · Journal of Medical Ultrasound · doi:10.1016/s0929-6441(09)60054-0 · Cited by 6
Hiperplasia suprarrenal congénita: asociación con translucencia nucal fetal aumentada
Anton, B., Serra, B. B., Adiego, B., Martínez-Orgado, J. A., Ancel, A. M., & Picarzo, J. P.-L. (2003) · Anales de Pediatría · doi:10.1016/s1695-4033(03)77991-0 · Cited by 6
Schmidt, P., Hörmansdörfer, C., STABOULIDOU, I., Hillemanns, P., & Scharf, A. (2008) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-007-0542-y · Cited by 6
Jugular lymphatic sacs in first‐trimester fetuses with normal nuchal translucency
de Mooij, Y. M., Bekker, M. N., Spreeuwenberg, M. D., & van Vugt, J. M. G. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6308 · Cited by 6
Kohatsu, M., de Carvalho, M. H. B., Francisco, R. P. V., Filho, A. G. D. A., & Zugaib, M. (2012) · Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira · doi:10.1590/s0104-42302012000600016 · Cited by 6
First Trimester Ultrasound Screening: An Update
Sonek, J., Glover, M., Zhou, M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2010) · Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1133 · Cited by 6
The general practitioner and the “new genetics”
Mann, L. M. (2003) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05449.x · Cited by 6
Prenatal Screening for Neural Tube Defects and Aneuploidy
Sutton, A. L. M., & Biggio, J. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-383834-6.00032-x · Cited by 6
The utilisation of nuchal translucency as a prenatal marker of Down syndrome, 1993–1999
Mulvey, S., Atchison, W. G., GRIMWADE, J. C., Renou, P. M., Shekleton, P., & Wallace, E. M. (2000) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb01173.x · Cited by 6
Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome
Reynolds, T. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)79785-3 · Cited by 6
Giorlandino, C., Margiotti, K., Fabiani, M., Mesoraca, A., D’Emidio, L., Raffio, R., Coco, C., Mastrandrea, M. L., Pasquale, C., Cupellaro, M., et al. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.71088 · Cited by 5
“Traditionally, enlarged NT has been strongly associated with chromosomal aneuploi-dies, congenital heart defects, and genetic syndromes (Socolov et al. 2017, Snijders et al. 1998, Baer et al. 2014, Souka et al. 1998).”
Sonia, R., & Shanthi, V. (2015) · Research Journal of Applied Sciences Engineering and Technology · doi:10.19026/rjaset.9.1385 · Cited by 5
Zhou, F., Yang, M., Zhang, Z., Zhu, H., Wang, J., Li, L., Xu, B., Xiang, Q., Hu, T., & Liu, S. (2025) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.05.003 · Cited by 5
Nakamura, M., Hasegawa, J., Arakaki, T., Takita, H., Hamada, S., Ichizuka, K., & Sekizawa, A. (2015) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000381803 · Cited by 5
Archivée: Utilisation de l’échographie du premier trimestre
(2003) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30681-8 · Cited by 5
Elevated nuchal translucency, is it time to discuss the cut off?
Pasquini, L., Ponziani, I., Spataro, E., Masini, G., Biancareddu, E., Cordisco, A., & Petraglia, F. (2023) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.14834 · Cited by 5
Ultraschalldiagnostik, Pränataldiagnostik in der Praxis
Gasiorek‐Wiens, A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45255-0_2 · Cited by 5
Anomalias e prognóstico fetal associados à translucência nucal aumentada e cariótipo anormal
Saldanha, F. A. T., Brizot, M. D. L., Lopes, L. M., Liao, A. W., & Zugaib, M. (2009) · Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira · doi:10.1590/s0104-42302009000100016 · Cited by 5
First trimester ultrasound screening of chromosomal abnormalities
Trninić-Pjević, A., & Novakov-Mikić, A. S. (2007) · Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo · doi:10.2298/sarh0704153t · Cited by 5
Evolução perinatal e pediátrica de crianças com translucência nucal aumentada e cariótipo normal
Vieira, L. A., Silva, S. V. L., de Faria, R. B., Lippi, U. G., & Lopes, R. G. C. (2013) · Revista Brasileira Ginecologia e Obstetrícia · doi:10.1590/s0100-72032013000600007 · Cited by 5
Correlation of nuchal translucency and thyroxine at 11–13 weeks of gestation
Hantoushzadeh, S., Tara, F., Salmanian, B., Gharedaghi, M. H., Nasri, K., Ganjizadeh, M., Ghaffari, S.-R., Tahmasebpour, A., Farrokhi, B., Abdollahi, A., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.784259 · Cited by 5
“Transabdominal ultrasound examination was carried out to evaluate NT thickness, CRL and any major fetal anomalies as previously described [17].”
MethodFirst-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
“According to a large study of almost 10,000 women, the NT was above the 95th centile in 82.2% of fetuses with trisomy 21 and 77.9% with other chromosomal defects, therefore presenting as a valuable marker for identification of fetal abnormalities [45].”
InfluentialIrwin (2001) · doi:10.1002/1096-8628(20010115)98:2
Metadata
- Authors
- Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 352
- Issue
- 9125
- Pages
- 343-346
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2148260008
- Cited by
- 1,572
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 73.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, prenatal diagnosis, nuchal translucency, maternal age, first-trimester screening, risk assessment, invasive prenatal diagnosis, sensitivity, chromosomal abnormalities, fetal karyotyping
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Chromosome Aberrations, Down Syndrome, Female, Fetus, Follow-Up Studies, Gestational Age, United Kingdom, Humans, Karyotyping, Maternal Age, Middle Aged, Neck, Phenotype, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Likelihood Functions, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length, Risk Assessment, Chromosome Disorders, Pregnant People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review