The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation
Abstract
Background Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 currently relies on assessment of risk followed by invasive testing in the 5% of pregnancies at the highest estimated risk. Selection of the high-risk group by a combination of maternal age and second-trimester maternal serum biochemistry gives a detection rate of about 60%. We investigated assessment of risk by a combination of maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness, measured by ultrasonography at 10-14 weeks of gestation.Methods The risk of trisomy 21 was estimated for 96127 women of median age 31 years (range 14-49) with singleton pregnancies. Ultrasonography was done by 306 appropriately trained sonographers in 22 centres. Risk of trisomy 21 was calculated from the maternal age and gestational-age-related prevalence, multiplied by a likelihood ratio depending on the deviation from normal in nuchal-translucency thickness for crown-rump length. The distribution of risks was investigated and the sensitivity of a cut-off risk of 1 in 300 was calculated. Phenotype was assessed by fetal karyotyping or clinical examination of liveborn infants.Findings The estimated trisomy-21 risk, from maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness, was 1 in 300 or higher in 7907 (8.3%) of 95476 normal pregnancies, 268 (82-2%) of 326 with trisomy 21, and 253 (77.9%) of 325 with other chromosomal defects. The 5% of the study population with the highest estimated risk included 77% of trisomy-21 cases.Interpretation Selection of the high-risk group for invasive testing by this method allows the detection of about 80% of affected pregnancies. However, even this method of risk assessment requires about 30 invasive tests for identification of one affected fetus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Combining clinical information (maternal age and serum parameters) with sonographic assessment of fetal characteristics, predominantly the assessment of nuchal translucency (NT), is recommended practice [131].”
In the citing paper
“According to a large study of almost 10,000 women, the NT was above the 95th centile in 82.2% of fetuses with trisomy 21 and 77.9% with other chromosomal defects, therefore presenting as a valuable marker for identification of fetal abnormalities [45].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, the CRL of the examined fetus should be between 45 mm and 84 mm according to the protocol described by Nicolaides et al. [45].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, the NT in combination with maternal age has a sensitivity of 82.2% and a negative predictive value of 99.9% [45].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
Nicolaides, K. H., Azar, G. B., Byrne, D. L., Mansur, C. A., & Marks, K. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6831.867 · Cited by 1,051
Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.
Wald, N. J., Cuckle, H., Densem, J. W., Nanchahal, K., Royston, P. J., Chard, T., Haddow, J. E., Knight, G. J., Palomaki, G. E., & Canick, J. A. (1988) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.297.6653.883 · Cited by 959
The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies
Sebire, N. J., Snijders, R. J. M., Hughes, K., Sepúlveda, W., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1997) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10948.x · Cited by 627
Pandya, P. P., Snijders, R. J. M., Johnson, S. P., Brizot, M. D. L., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1995) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10902.x · Cited by 409
The lambda sign at 10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of chorionicity in twin pregnancies
Sepúlveda, W., Sebire, N. J., Hughes, K., Odibo, A. O., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1996) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07060421.x · Cited by 357
Nicolaides, K. H., Brizot, M. D. L., & Snijders, R. J. M. (1994) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11946.x · Cited by 353
Maternal Age and Gestational Age-Specific Risk for Chromosomal Defects
Snijders, R. J. M., Sebire, N. J., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000264259 · Cited by 278
Increased nuchal translucency at 10—14 weeks of gestation as a marker for major cardiac defects
Hyett, J. A., Perdu, M., Sharland, G. K., Snijders, R. J. M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1997) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10040242.x · Cited by 234
Chromosomal defects and outcome in 1015 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency
Pandya, P. P., Kondylios, A., Hilbert, L., Snijders, R. J. M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1995) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05010015.x · Cited by 231
Sebire, N. J., Snijders, R. J. M., Hughes, K., Sepúlveda, W., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1996) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09550.x · Cited by 219
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,001
Ductus venosus blood flow in chromosomally abnormal fetuses at 11 to 14 weeks of gestation
Matias, A., & Montenegro, N. A. M. D. M. (2001) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/sper.2001.22893 · Cited by 29
Abnormal cardiac function in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency
Rizzo, G., Muscatello, A., Angelini, E., & Capponi, A. (2003) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.137 · Cited by 29
“Using previously reported techniques6 the following measurements were performed: (1) pulmonary arterial and aortic maximum peak systolic velocities (PV); (2) pulmonary arterial and aortic time to peak velocity (TPV) which was calculated as the time interval between the onset of the waveform and its peak; (3) E-wave (e…”
MethodWayda, K., Keresztúri, A., Orvos, H., Horváth, E., Pál, A., Kovács, L., & Szabó, J. T. (2001) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801205.x · Cited by 29
“Use of a risk calculation involving a combination of the maternal age, gestational age, NT thickness and former aneuploidy allowed the setting-up of a risk cutoff level Ø1:300 (24).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSome thoughts on the true value of ultrasound
Nicolaides, K. H. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5156 · Cited by 29
Adiego, B., Illescas, T., Martínez-Ten, P., Bermejo, C., Pérez-Pedregosa, J., Wong, A. E., & Sepúlveda, W. (2012) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2944 · Cited by 27
Sananès, N., Guigue, V., Köhler, M., Bouffet, N., Cancellier, M., Hornecker, F., Hunsinger, M. C., Köhler, A. C., Mager, C., Neumann, M., et al. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.7534 · Cited by 30
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing beyond Trisomies
Suciu, I. D., Toader, O. D., Galeva, S., & Pop, L. G. (2019) · Journal of Medicine and Life · doi:10.25122/jml-2019-0053 · Cited by 28
“Screening age was set up at 40 years old, but later, when the risk of amniocentesis was well-ascertained, the screening age was lowered at 35 and older, encompassing 5% of all women with a 30% detection rate of babies with Down syndrome [1].”
BackgroundSperm mosaicism: implications for genomic diversity and disease
Breuss, M. W., Yang, X., & Gleeson, J. G. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.05.007 · Cited by 29
Becker, R., Schmitz, L., Kilavuz, S., Stümm, M., Wegner, R., & Bittner, U. (2012) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.3854 · Cited by 28
Maymon, R., Zimerman, A. L., Weinraub, Z., Herman, A., & Cuckle, H. (2008) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5307 · Cited by 28
From Down syndrome screening to noninvasive prenatal testing: 20 years' experience in Taiwan
Shaw, S. W., Chen, C., & Cheng, P. (2013) · Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2013.10.003 · Cited by 28
Farina, A., Caramelli, E., Concu, M., Sekizawa, A., Ruggeri, R., Bovicelli, L., Rizzo, N., & Carinci, P. (2002) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.262 · Cited by 28
Down Syndrome Screening in Multiple Pregnancies
Matias, A., Montenegro, N. A. M. D. M., & Blickstein, I. (2005) · Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2004.10.001 · Cited by 28
“This method has been shown to identify about 75% of trisomy 21–affected fetuses for a screen-positive rate of approximately 5% [10,11].”
MethodNuchal translucency and lymphatic system maldevelopment
Bellini, C., Rutigliani, M., Boccardo, F. M., Bonioli, E., Campisi, C., Grillo, F., Bellini, T., Valenzano, M. M., & Fulcheri, E. (2009) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm.2009.107 · Cited by 28
Spencer, K. (2001) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.94 · Cited by 28
What's new in first trimester ultrasound
Lazarus, E. (2003) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(03)00039-3 · Cited by 28
“Using a cutoff of 3 mm, approximately 1% to 5% of first trimester fetuses demonstrate nuchal translucency [61,63,67–69].”
BackgroundMethodWitters, I., Moerman, P., Devriendt, K., Braet, P., Schoubroeck, D. V., Assche, F. A. V., & Fryns, J. P. (2002) · American Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.10208 · Cited by 28
Fetal echocardiography in trisomy 18
Moyano, D., Huggon, I. C., & Allan, L. D. (2005) · Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal · doi:10.1136/adc.2004.070342 · Cited by 28
DeVore, G. R., & Romero, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.645 · Cited by 28
Zoppi, M. A., Ibba, R. M., Putzolu, M., Floris, M., & Monni, G. (2000) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000020999 · Cited by 28
Hypophosphatasia associated with increased nuchal translucency: a report of two affected pregnancies
Souka, A. P., Raymond, F. L., Mornet, É., Geerts, L., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2002) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00793.x · Cited by 28
Prenatal management, pregnancy and pediatric outcomes in fetuses with septated cystic hygroma
Sanhal, C. Y., Mendilcioğlu, İ., Ozekinci, M., Yakut, S., Merdun, Z., Simsek, M., & Lüleci, G. (2014) · Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research · doi:10.1590/1414-431x20143895 · Cited by 26
“Extensive usage of ultrasound screening has increased the rate of detection of CH in pregnancies (3).”
BackgroundNoninvasive Approaches to Prenatal Diagnosis: Historical Perspective and Future Directions
Hui, L. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8889-1_3 · Cited by 27
Maternal serum insulin‐like growth factor‐I at 11–13 weeks in preeclampsia
Sifakis, S., Akolekar, R., Kappou, D., Mantas, N., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2010) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2555 · Cited by 27
“In addition, the maternal serum PAPP-A and free β-hCG are determined and the results are combined with the fetal NT to calculate the pregnancy-specific risk for trisomy 21 (Snijders et al., 1998; Kagan et al., 2008).”
MethodPosterior brain in fetuses with trisomy 18, trisomy 13 and triploidy at 11 to 13 weeks' gestation
Ferreira, A. F. A., Syngelaki, A., Smolin, A., Vayna, A., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2012) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.3920 · Cited by 27
Fetal biometry to assess the size and growth of the fetus
O’Gorman, N., & Salomon, L. J. (2018) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.005 · Cited by 28
Chorionic villus sampling and risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Adusumalli, J., Han, C. S., Beckham, S., Bartholomew, M. L., & Williams, J. (2007) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.015 · Cited by 27
Three‐dimensional ultrasonography and assessment of the first‐trimester fetus.
Hull, A., James, G., Salerno, C. C., Nelson, T., & Pretorius, D. H. (2001) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.2001.20.4.287 · Cited by 27
Geipel, A., Gembruch, U., Ludwig, M. Z., Germer, U., SCHWINGER, E., Dormeier, A., & Diedrich, K. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.10.2629 · Cited by 27
Huang, T., Gibbons, C., Rashid, S., Priston, M., Bedford, H. M., Mak‐Tam, E., & Meschino, W. S. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03394-w · Cited by 26
Maternal Serum Adiponectin at 11–13 Weeks of Gestation in Preeclampsia
Nanda, S., Yu, C.-S., Giurcaneanu, L., Akolekar, R., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2011) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000322402 · Cited by 26
Prenatal detection of Noonan syndrome by mutation analysis of the PTPN11 and the KRAS genes
Houweling, A. C., de Mooij, Y. M., van der Burgt, I., Yntema, H. G., Lachmeijer, A. M. A., & Go, A. T. J. I. (2010) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2458 · Cited by 26
“…translucency; PTPN11; KRAS; prenatal Ultrasonographic measurement of the nuchal translucency (NT, in the second trimester referred to as nuchal skin fold) in the first trimester of pregnancy has become an established method for identifying fetuses at risk for aneuploidy (Snijders et al., 1998).”
MethodWright, D. E., Syngelaki, A., STABOULIDOU, I., Cruz, J. D. J., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2011) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2643 · Cited by 26
“At our centre, early screening for trisomies in twins is based on maternal age and the measurement of fetal NT at 11 to 13+6 weeks’ gestation (Snijders et al., 1998).”
MethodDown's syndrome screening in pregnancies after assisted reproductive techniques: an update
Maymon, R., & Jauniaux, E. R. M. (2002) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61819-6 · Cited by 26
“These findings validate the practical implementation of nuchal translucency measurements originally obtained in singletons (Pandya et al., 1995a; Snijders et al., 1998) and twins (Pandya et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialFrontomaxillary facial angle in fetuses with trisomy 13 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks
Borenstein, M., Persico, N., Dagklis, T., Faros, E., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5135 · Cited by 26
Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Disorders
Wapner, R. J., Jenkins, T. M., & Khalek, N. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4160-4224-2.50019-3 · Cited by 26
Intelligent Noninvasive Diagnosis of Aneuploidy: Raw Values and Highly Imbalanced Dataset
Neocleous, A. C., Nicolaides, K. H., & Schizas, C. N. (2016) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2016.2608859 · Cited by 26
“[2], [3], Kagan et al.”
Constriction band of the arm following insertion of a pleuro‐amniotic shunt
Brown, R. N., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2000) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00114.x · Cited by 26
Impact of audit of routine second‐trimester cardiac images using a novel image‐scoring method
Sairam, S., Awadh, A. M. A., Cook, K., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Carvalho, J. S. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6323 · Cited by 26
First Trimester Screening: The BUN Study
Wapner, R. J. (2005) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2005.05.013 · Cited by 26
Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: Ten year experience in the Israeli population
Shohat, M., Frimer, H., Shohat‐Levy, V., Esmailzadeh, H., Appelman, Z., Ben‐Neriah, Z., Dar, H., Orr‐Urtreger, A., Amiel, A., Gershoni, R., et al. (2003) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.20246 · Cited by 26
“Nuchal translucency at 11–14 weeks gestation has been found to be effective in DS screening with a prenatal detection rate of 77–82% of DS cases and 78% of other chromosomal anomalies—all with the same false positive rate of 5% [Pandya et al., 1995; Nielson, 1997; Snijders et al., 1998].”
BackgroundDown's syndrome screening: a controversial test, with more controversy to come!
Reynolds, T. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.53.12.893 · Cited by 26
Rizzo, G., Silvestri, E., Capponi, A., Servadei, F., Pietrolucci, M. E., Capece, A., Pisa, R., & Arduini, D. (2010) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.3109/14767058.2010.482627 · Cited by 25
“Pregnancies of both groups fulfilled all the following criteria of inclusion: (1) singleton pregnancies, (2) successful recordings of placental volume and 3D vascularization, (3) surplus villi material available not needed for karyotyping, (4) absence of preexisting maternal diseases (diabetes, chronic hypertension, r…”
MethodKelley, J., McGillivray, G., Meagher, S. E., & Hui, L. (2021) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6024 · Cited by 28
“for trisomy 21, 13, and 18, providing detection rates of 85% or more for pregnancies at 11–13 weeks gestation.(2) However, with the implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) over the past decade, FTCS has yielded some of its dominance, with 20% or more of women in some countries now choosing NIPT as their…”
BackgroundLi, W.-J., Wang, X., Yan, R., & Xiang, J. (2015) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000369797 · Cited by 25
Nuchal Translucency Thickness in Monochorionic Multiple Pregnancies
Casasbuenas, A., Wong, A. E., & Sepúlveda, W. (2008) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.2008.27.3.363 · Cited by 25
Increased nuchal translucency and adverse pregnancy outcomes
Shakoor, S., Dileep, D., Tirmizi, S., Rashid, S., Amin, Y., & Munim, S. (2016) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2016.1224836 · Cited by 25
The association between prenatal atrioventricular septal defects and chromosomal abnormalities
Morlando, M., Bhide, A., Familiari, A., Khalil, A. A., Morales‐Roselló, J., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Carvalho, J. S. (2016) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.039 · Cited by 25
The added value of detailed early anomaly scan in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency
Zalel, Y., Zemet, R., & Kivilevitch, Z. (2016) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4997 · Cited by 25
Femur and humerus length in trisomy 21 fetuses at 11–14 weeks of gestation
Longo, D., Defigueiredo, D., Cicero, S., Sacchini, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2004) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.970 · Cited by 25
Increasing total prevalence rate of cases with Down syndrome in Hungary
Métneki, J., & Czeizel, A. E. (2005) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-005-4261-z · Cited by 25
Johnson, J.-A. M., Babul‐Hirji, R., & Chitayat, D. A. (2001) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00320.x · Cited by 25
Cheng, P., Liu, C., Chueh, H., Lin, C., & Soong, Y. (2003) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.581 · Cited by 25
Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis
Cheng, W.-L., Hsiao, C., Tseng, H.-W., & Lee, T. (2015) · Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2015.05.002 · Cited by 23
Scott, F., PETERS, H., Bonifacio, M., McLennan, A., Boogert, A., Kesby, G., & ANDERSON, J. (2004) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2004.00205.x · Cited by 24
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a first‐trimester ultrasound aneuploidy screening program
Sepúlveda, W., Wong, A. E., Casasbuenas, A., Solari, A., & Alcalde, J. L. (2008) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2019 · Cited by 24
Maternal Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein in Normal Pregnancy at 11–13 Weeks’ Gestation
Bredaki, F. E., Wright, D. E., Akolekar, R., Cruz, G., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2011) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000330200 · Cited by 24
Automated detection of fetal nuchal translucency based on hierarchical structural model
Deng, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, P. (2010) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms.2010.6042618 · Cited by 25
Loureiro, T., Ferreira, A. F. A., Ushakov, F. B., Montenegro, N. A. M. D. M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2012) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000338113 · Cited by 24
RETIRED: The Use of First Trimester Ultrasound
Demianczuk, N. N., den Hof, M. C. V., Farquharson, D. F., Lewthwaite, B. J., Gagnon, R. J., Morin, L. M., Salem, S., & Skoll, A. (2003) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30680-6 · Cited by 24
TEKESIN, I. (2019) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1080/01443615.2019.1621822 · Cited by 24
“Based on a reference range established in a large study that includes nearly 96,127 pregnancies, an NT measurement equal to or above the 95th percentile is referred to as an increased NT thickness (Snijders et al. 1998).”
BackgroundIncreased nuchal translucency at 11–13 weeks' gestation and outcome in twin pregnancy
Cimpoca-Raptis, B. A., Syngelaki, A., Litwińska, E., Muzaferovic, A., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2019) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.21935 · Cited by 24
Tsai, M., Lee, F., Cheng, C., Hwa, K., Cheong, M.-L. J., & She, B. (2002) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.396 · Cited by 24
“Fetal NT was measured following previous established criteria (Snijders et al., 1998; Nicolaides et al., 1999; Tsai et al., 2001).”
Comparison between two‐ and three‐dimensional ultrasound measurements of nuchal translucency
Clementschitsch, G., Hasenöhrl, G., Schaffer, H., & Steiner, H. (2001) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00566.x · Cited by 24
Soergel, P., Pruggmayer, M., Schwerdtfeger, R., Mühlhaus, K., & Scharf, A. (2006) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000091353 · Cited by 24
Al‐Mufti, R., Hambley, H., Farzaneh, F., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 24
Patient preference regarding first-trimester aneuploidy risk assessment
Sharma, G., Gold, H. T., Chervenak, F. A., McCullough, L. B., Alt, A. K., & Chasen, S. T. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.064 · Cited by 24
Chan, F.-Y., & Oats, J. J. N. (2001) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04261.x · Cited by 24
Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Abnormalities through Amniocentesis
BENN, P. A. (2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444314342.ch6 · Cited by 24
Iliescu, D. G., Comănescu, A. C., Antsaklis, P. J., Tudorache, Ş., Ghiluşi, M. C., Comănescu, V., Paulescu, D., Ceauşu, I., Antsaklis, A., Novac, L. V., et al. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 23
Evans, M. I., Krantz, D., Hallahan, T., & Sherwin, J. E. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.9023 · Cited by 23
Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index Assessment at 11-13+6 Weeks' Gestation
Ridding, G., Schlüter, P. J., Hyett, J. A., & McLennan, A. (2014) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000361021 · Cited by 23
Lai, T., Chen, S., Tsai, M., Lee, F., & Wei, C.-F. (2003) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1023/a:1024813708875 · Cited by 23
Latest advances and topics in fetal echocardiography
Bhat, A. H., & Sahn, D. J. (2004) · Current Opinion in Cardiology · doi:10.1097/00001573-200403000-00005 · Cited by 23
Effect of fetal gender on first‐trimester ductus venosus blood flow
Prefumo, F., Venturini, P. L., & Biasio, P. D. (2003) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.205 · Cited by 23
Outcome of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency
Bilardo, C. M., Müller, M. A., & Pajkrt, E. (2001) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00001703-200104000-00012 · Cited by 23
Bedside estimation of Down syndrome risk during first‐trimester ultrasound screening
Herman, A., Dreazen, E., Herman, A., Batukan, C., Holzgreve, W., & Tercanli, S. (2002) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00835.x · Cited by 23
Bijlsma, E. K., Knegt, A. C., Bilardo, C. M., & Goodman, F. R. (2005) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1080 · Cited by 23
Palomaki, G. E., Eklund, E. E., Neveux, L. M., & Lambert-Messerlian, G. M. (2015) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4609 · Cited by 22
Bayón, J. C., Orruño, E., Portillo, I., & Asua, J. (2019) · Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation · doi:10.1186/s12962-019-0173-8 · Cited by 22
Late Motherhood in Low-Fertility Countries: Reproductive Intentions, Trends and Consequences
Beaujouan, É., & Sobotka, T. (2021) · doi:10.1553/0x003cd014 · Cited by 23
A prospective two years study of first trimester screening for Down syndrome.
Kourtidou-Papadeli, C., Papadelis, C. L., Vernikos-Danellis, J., Bamidis, P. D., Hitoglou-Antoniadou, M., Perantoni, E., & Vlachogiannis, E. (2008) · PubMed Central · Cited by 22
Nuchal Translucency and First Trimester Risk Assessment
Sheppard, C., & Platt, L. D. (2007) · Ultrasound Quarterly · doi:10.1097/01.ruq.0000263846.00185.61 · Cited by 22
Pregnancy Outcome of Abnormal Nuchal Translucency: A Systematic Review
Roozbeh, N. (2017) · JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2017/23755.9384 · Cited by 22
Femur length and trisomy 21: impact of gestational age on screening efficiency
Snijders, R. J. M., Platt, L. D., Greene, N., Carlson, D. E., Krakow, D., Gregory, K. D., & Bradley, K. (2000) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00198.x · Cited by 22
Gyselaers, W., Vereecken, A. J., Herck, E. J. H. V., Straetmans, D. P. L., Jonge, E. T. M. D., Ombelet, W. U. A. M., & Nijhuis, J. G. (2004) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.1732 · Cited by 22
“(2) The use of appropriate equipment is mandatory to perform decent ultrasound examinations and NT measurements16.”
BackgroundMethodSonographic screening for fetal aneuploidy: first trimester.
Souter, V. L., & Nyberg, D. A. (2001) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.2001.20.7.775 · Cited by 22
Congenital lymphedema presenting with increased nuchal translucency at 13 weeks of gestation
Souka, A. P., Krampl, E., Geerts, L., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2002) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.104 · Cited by 22
Sagi‐Dain, L., Singer, A., Shachar, S. B., Josefsberg, S. B. Y., Feingold-Zadok, M., Greenbaum, L., & Maya, I. (2020) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000004195 · Cited by 21
First and early second trimester fetal heart screening
Yagel, S., Cohen, S. M., Messing, B., & Achiron, R. (2008) · Series in maternal-fetal medicine · doi:10.3109/9781439807989.013 · Cited by 21
Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics
Gigerenzer, G. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199390076.003.0005 · Cited by 25
Burger, N. B., Stuurman, K. E., Kok, E., Konijn, T., Schooneman, D. P. M., Niederreither, K., Coles, M. C., Agace, W. W., Christoffels, V. M., Mebius, R. E., et al. (2014) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4473 · Cited by 21
Prefumo, F., & Thilaganathan, B. (2002) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.432 · Cited by 21
“Nuchal translucency (NT) measurement at 10–14 weeks’ gestation in combination with maternal age has been demonstrated to be an effective screening test for Down syndrome (Snijders et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCho, H. Y., Kwon, J., Kim, Y. H., Lee, K. H., Kim, J., Kim, S. Y., & Park, Y. W. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.8996 · Cited by 21
Nuchal Translucency-Based Down Syndrome Screening: Barriers to Implementation
Malone, F. D. (2005) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2005.05.002 · Cited by 21
Miller, J. L., de Veciana, M., Turan, Ş., Kush, M., Manogura, A. C., Harman, C. R., & Baschat, A. (2013) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.041 · Cited by 21
Screening for Chromosomal Defects by Fetal Nuchal Translucency at 11 to 14 Weeks
BINDRA, R., Heath, V., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2002) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00003081-200209000-00010 · Cited by 21
“In the Fetal Medicine Foundation Multicenter Project it was estimated that assessment of risk by a combination of maternal age and fetal NT, followed by invasive diagnostic testing for those with a risk of >1 in 300, and selective termination of affected fetuses would have reduced the potential live birth prevalence o…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKelekçi, S., Yilmaz, B., Savan, K., & Sonmez, S. (2005) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1080/01443610500231518 · Cited by 21
“Up to 80% of aneuploid fetuses have increased NT, but this feature is also found in 5% of karyotypically normal fetuses at this stage of the pregnancy (Snijder et al. 1998).”
BackgroundHollis, B., Mavrides, E., Carvalho, J. S., Hill, L., Dickinson, V., & Thilaganathan, B. (2001) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00434.x · Cited by 21
Fredouille, C., Piercecchi‐Marti, M., Liprandi, A., Duyme, M., Gonzalès, M., Bigi, N., Rouault, F., & Pellissier, J. (2002) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000048037 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 352
- Issue
- 9125
- Pages
- 343-346
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2148260008
- Cited by
- 1,572
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 73.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, prenatal diagnosis, nuchal translucency, maternal age, first-trimester screening, risk assessment, invasive prenatal diagnosis, sensitivity, chromosomal abnormalities, fetal karyotyping
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Chromosome Aberrations, Down Syndrome, Female, Fetus, Follow-Up Studies, Gestational Age, United Kingdom, Humans, Karyotyping, Maternal Age, Middle Aged, Neck, Phenotype, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Likelihood Functions, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length, Risk Assessment, Chromosome Disorders, Pregnant People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review