Cited by 74Child Abuse and TraumaResilience and Mental HealthSleep and related disorders

Using sleep dysfunction to explore the nature of resilience in adult survivors of childhood abuse or trauma

Chambers, Elisha, Belicki, Kathy·1998·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective In early studies, resilience to trauma was equated with psychological well-being. This study explores the possibility that such resilience is better described as social-behavioral competency and that, in turn, such competency can conceal emotional pain.Method A university sample of 97 participants, 79 women and 18 men, completed measures of childhood abuse and trauma, resilient characteristics, and sleep dysfunction. The measures of sleep problems could be divided into those tapping psychological well-being (e.g., nightmare frequency) and those reflecting social-behavioral functioning (e.g., measures of the impact of nightmares on waking functioning).Results Fifty-three participants reported experiencing one or more types of trauma or abuse in childhood. As a group they scored more negatively than those reporting no abuse on measures of sleep dysfunction. Resilient characteristics were only related to measures of social-behavioral functioning, not well-being.Conclusions The findings are consistent with current conceptualizations of trauma/abuse recovery as involving multiple dimensions of functioning, some of which are more publicly observable than others. Therefore, some apparently resilient individuals may have good social-behavioral competency while still experiencing psychological pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0145-2134(98)00059-3

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adverse experiences before age 14, compared to no adversity, led to more frequent recall of nightmares, more distress from nightmares, and greater waking impact of nightmares.

    “A second study (58) demonstrated that adverse experiences before age 14, compared to no adversity, led to more frequent recall of nightmares, more distress from nightmares, and greater waking impact of nightmares.”

    From The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares (2017) · cites this paper as [58]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chambers, E., & Belicki, K.
Affiliations
Brock University (CA)
Corresponding author
Belicki, Kathy
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
753-758
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010677910
Cited by
74
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
resilience, childhood abuse, childhood trauma, sleep disorders, nightmares, psychological well-being, emotional pain, trauma recovery, adult survivors
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep Wake Disorders, Social Adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review