Cited by 10Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

When was your earliest dream? Association of very early dream recall with frequent current nightmares supports a stress-acceleration explanation of nightmares

Nielsen, Tore·2017·Dreaming

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/drm0000051

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For negative dreams, the same pattern was found: nightmare frequency was higher for recall at age 3 than at age 4 and marginally higher at age 5 than at age 6.

    “The same pattern was again found (Figure 4C), i.e., nightmare frequency was higher for recall at age 3 than at age 4 and marginally higher at age 5 than at age 6.”

    From The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares (2017) · cites this paper as [131]

  • For positive dreams, age 1 had a low sample size (12) and only differed marginally from later ages.

    “Age 1 had a low sample size (12) and only differed marginally from later ages.”

    From The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares (2017) · cites this paper as [131]

  • The four most commonly selected earliest dreams accounted for 40.2% of all selected dreams; these were being chased, falling, flying or soaring, and encountering an evil force or demon.

    “the four most commonly selected earliest dreams accounted for 40.2% (10,940/27,211) of all selected dreams; in decreasing prevalence these were items 1-being chased (14.02% or 3,816), 12-falling (11.44% or 3,113), 11-flying or soaring through the air (9.45% or 2,572), and 56-encountering a kind of evil force or demon (5.29% or 1,439).”

    From The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares (2017) · cites this paper as [131]

  • In the same sample, all ages 1-3 differed from all ages 4-10 in nightmare recall.

    “All of ages 1–3 differed from all of ages 4–10.”

    From The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares (2017) · cites this paper as [131]

  • For positive dreams, there was a significant breakpoint between ages 2 and 3.

    “Participants recalling earlier positive dreams again reported more current nightmares, but there was now a significant breakpoint between ages 2 and 3.”

    From The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares (2017) · cites this paper as [131]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nielsen, T.
Venue
Dreaming
Published
2017-06
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
122-136
ISSN
  • 1053-0797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3351
OpenAlex
W2612202525
Cited by
10
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Dreaming (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-115125)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (312277)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
nightmares, dream recall, stress, dream content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review