Cited by 190International Student and Expatriate ChallengesCultural Differences and ValuesLanguage, Communication, and Linguistic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and validation of a measure of intercultural adjustment potential in Japanese sojourners: the Intercultural Adjustment Potential Scale (ICAPS)

Matsumoto, David, LeRoux, Jeff, Ratzlaff, Charlotte, Tatani, Haruyo, Uchida, Hideko, Kim, Chu, Araki, Shoko·2001·International Journal of Intercultural Relations

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0147-1767(01)00019-0

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ICAPS has utility in predicting intercultural adjustment.

    “The analysis showed the composite score of the ICAPS was significantly correlated with self, peer, and interviewer ratings ( r = .69, .70, and .66, respectively; p < .001), which supported the utility of the ICAPS in predicting intercultural adjustment.”
  • The composite score of the ICAPS was significantly correlated with self, peer, and interviewer ratings (r = .69, .70, .66; p < .001).

    “The analysis showed the composite score of the ICAPS was significantly correlated with self, peer, and interviewer ratings ( r = .69, .70, and .66, respectively; p &lt; .001), which supported the utility of the ICAPS in predicting intercultural adjustment.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Berry, J., Sam, D. (1997). Acculturation and adaptation. In: J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Social and behavioral applications, Vol. 3 .Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Kim, C., LeRoux, J., Ratzlaff, C., Uchida, H., DeGere, D., Iwamoto, M., Schneider, N., Tatani, H., & Matsumoto, D. (1999). Testing the validity of the intercultural adjustment potential scale. Poster session presented at the annual American Psychological Association conference, August, Boston, MA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Matsumoto, D., LeRoux, J., Ratzlaff, C., Tatani, H., Uchida, H., Kim, C., & Araki, S.
Affiliations
San Francisco State University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
483-510
ISSN
0147-1767 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067017210
Cited by
190
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Intercultural Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
Keywords
Japanese immigrants, scale development, psychometric validation, intercultural training, intercultural competence, incremental validity, construct validity, convergent validity, expert ratings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review