The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications
Abstract
Sixty-three studies published in the years 1997–2002 are reviewed to assess the effects of workplace diversity on teams and organizations. Four major questions are considered: Which personal attributes have diversity researchers studied in recent years? What has been learned about the consequences of diversity for teams and organizations? What has been learned about the role of context in shaping the effects of diversity? How has research addressed the multi-level complexities inherent in the phenomenon of diversity? For each question, we consider the strengths and weaknesses of recent diversity research, point out opportunities for new research, and identify threats to continued advancement. The review concludes by considering practical implications of the accumulated evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 · Cited by 6,001
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217 · Cited by 3,413
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971
THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF CONFLICT: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF INTRAGROUP CONFLICT AND GROUP PERFORMANCE.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069453 · Cited by 2,487
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667087 · Cited by 2,433 · cited 1×
“Greater use of qualitative ethnographic narratives offers another avenue for new research (e.g., see Bell & Nkomo, 2001; Li, Xin & Pillutla, 2002; Thomas & Ely, 2001).”
MethodTo your heart's content: a model of affective diversity in top management teams
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667020 · Cited by 599
Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/3069328 · Cited by 583
Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity
Elron, E. (1997) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(97)90021-7 · Cited by 251
Cited by
van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546 · Cited by 2,200
Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0412 · Cited by 1,939
The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review
Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.41331491 · Cited by 1,362
The Benefits of Climate for Inclusion for Gender-Diverse Groups
Nishii, L. H. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0823 · Cited by 1,354
What Differences Make a Difference?: The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x · Cited by 1,276
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 801-830
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103612294
- Cited by
- 1,168
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 21.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
