The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review
Abstract
Integrating macro and micro theoretical perspectives, we conducted a meta-analysis examining the role of contextual factors in team diversity research. Using data from 8,757 teams in 39 studies conducted in organizational settings, we examined whether contextual factors at multiple levels, including industry, occupation, and team, influenced the performance outcomes of relations-oriented and task-oriented diversity. The direct effects were very small yet significant, and after we accounted for industry, occupation, and team-level contextual moderators, they doubled or tripled in size. Further, occupation- and industry-level moderators explained significant variance in effect sizes across studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The direct relationship between team diversity and performance is generally small and strongly dependent on context.
“Meta-analytic work similarly shows that the direct relationship between team diversity and performance is generally small and strongly dependent on context (Joshi & Roh, 2009).”
From Inclusive Workplaces and Performance: An Integrative Review of Diversity and Employee Outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as Joshi & Roh, 2009
Joshi and Roh (2009), synthesizing data from 8,757 teams across 39 organizational studies, found very small direct diversity effects but stronger relationships once industry, occupation, and team-level moderators were considered.
“Joshi and Roh (2009), synthesizing data from 8,757 teams across 39 organizational studies, found very small direct diversity effects but stronger relationships once industry, occupation, and team-level moderators were considered.”
From Inclusive Workplaces and Performance: An Integrative Review of Diversity and Employee Outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as Joshi and Roh (2009)
According to the Categorization-Elaboration Model, the effects of diversity on team performance can be understood by considering the favorable and unfavorable processes that diversity may instigate.
“According to the Categorization-Elaboration Model (CEM; Van Knippenberg et al., 2004), the effects of diversity on team performance can be understood by considering the favorable and unfavorable processes that diversity may instigate (Joshi & Roh, 2009;Van Knippenberg et al., 2004;Williams & O'Reilly, 1998).”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Joshi & Roh, 2009
Cites
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · see citing works
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 · Cited by 6,001 · see citing works
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542 · see citing works
Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741 · Cited by 3,071 · cited 1× · see citing works
“On the other hand, in long-term teams, task requirements may be more stable, and distribution of tasks and roles may also be more clearly defined (De Dreu & Weingart, 2003).”
BackgroundExploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971 · see citing works
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273 · see citing works
A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
Orwin, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164923 · Cited by 2,064 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The failsafe k was also calculated to identify the number of “file drawer” (unknown) studies of the same relationship with a true correlation of zero needed to widen the reported confidence interval enough to include zero (Orwin, 1983; Rosenthal, 1979).”
MethodInteraction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment
Ridgeway, C. L. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657301 · Cited by 939 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…from stereotypes associated with underrepresented groups in a particular occupational context, implicit status differences between demographic groups may also be a mechanism by which contextual factors such as occupational demography filter into team-level interactions (see Ridgeway, 1991, 1997).”
BackgroundEly, R. J. (1994) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393234 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective
Bunderson, J. S. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556637 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700202 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Location-Level Links between Diversity and Innovative Climate Depend on National Power Distance
van der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., & Huang, X. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.19573116 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.85 · Cited by 1,248 · see citing works
Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0837 · Cited by 738 · see citing works
Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017190 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Guillaume, Y. R. F., Dawson, J. F., Otaye‐Ebede, L., Woods, S. A., & West, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2040 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., George, G., & Nichols, C. V. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.4005 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Mor Barak, M. E., Lizano, E. L., Kim, A., Duan, L., Rhee, M.-K., Hsiao, H.-Y., & Brimhall, K. C. (2016) · Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance · doi:10.1080/23303131.2016.1138915 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000482 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Age Metastereotyping and Cross-Age Workplace Interactions: A Meta View of Age Stereotypes at Work
Finkelstein, L. M., King, E. B., & Voyles, E. C. (2015) · Work, Aging and Retirement · doi:10.1093/workar/wau002 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alturki, U., Alamri, M., Bin Saud, M. S., Kamin, Y. B., Aljeraiwi, A. A., & Alhamed, O. A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2906668 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Good ergonomics and team diversity reduce absenteeism and errors in car manufacturing
Fritzsche, L., Wegge, J., Schmauder, M., Kliegel, M., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2014) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.875597 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Kunze, F., & Menges, J. I. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2129 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Kramer, W. S., Shuffler, M. L., & Feitosa, J. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.007 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Chatman, J. A., Greer, L. L., Sherman, E., & Doerr, B. (2019) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1268 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Inclusive Workplaces and Performance: An Integrative Review of Diversity and Employee Outcomes
Abudawood, B. B. (2026) · Journal of Business and Management Studies · doi:10.32996/jbms.2026.8.10.3
- Authors
- Joshi, A., & Roh, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 599-627
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2115638724
- Cited by
- 1,362
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 96 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 60.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- team diversity, contextual factors, team performance, macro and micro perspectives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review