The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Apart from technology: understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE
MORRIS, M. G., & VENKATESH, V. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00206.x · Cited by 1,723 · cited 1×
“Psychologists therefore point towards a range of cognitive and affective factors as important in determining an individuals’ engagement with technology—such as perceived ease of use, self-efficacy, perceived behavioural control and perceived ability [31–33].”
BackgroundMass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge
Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267786 · Cited by 1,537
Cited by
Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide
Selwyn, N. (2004) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444804042519 · Cited by 1,437
Self-citationMcLean, G., & Osei-Frimpong, K. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009 · Cited by 762
Hengstler, M., Enkel, E., & Duelli, S. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.014 · Cited by 661
Information and communication technology: Implications for job stress and employee well-being
Day, A., Scott, N., & Kevin Kelloway, E. (2010) · Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being · doi:10.1108/s1479-3555(2010)0000008011 · Cited by 218
The use of everyday technology by people with dementia living alone: Mapping out the difficulties
Nygård, L., & Starkhammar, S. (2007) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860600844168 · Cited by 193
Why Do They Refuse to Use My Robot?: Reasons for Non-Use Derived from a Long-Term Home Study
de Graaf, M., Ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2909824.3020236 · Cited by 169
"Alexa is a Toy": Exploring Older Adults' Reasons for Using, Limiting, and Abandoning Echo
Trajkova, M., & Martin-Hammond, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376760 · Cited by 154
Stieger, S., & Lewetz, D. (2018) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0070 · Cited by 135
Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention
Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Morgans, A., Ozanne, E., & Kulik, L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858458 · Cited by 127
An exploratory study of a touch-based gestural interface for elderly
Leonardi, C., Albertini, A., Pianesi, F., & Zancanaro, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries · doi:10.1145/1868914.1869045 · Cited by 58
Division of digital labor: Partner support for technology use among older adults
Marler, W., & Hargittai, E. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211068437 · Cited by 56
Perilli, V., Lancioni, G. E., Laporta, D., Paparella, A., Caffò, A. O., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., & Oliva, D. (2013) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.016 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Selwyn, N.
- Venue
- Technology in Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-116
- ISSN
- 0160-791X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148999227
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 80.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
