The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of the Beck depression inventory for primary care to screen for major depression disorders
Abstract
To ascertain how effective the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care (BDI-PC) was in screening for DSM-IV major depression disorders (MDD) in outpatients who were scheduled for routine office visits with physicians specializing in internal medicine, the BDI-PC was administered to 60 male and 60 female outpatients. The internal consistency of the BDI-PC was high (alpha 0.85), and the Mood Module from the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders was used to diagnose MDD. The BDI-PC scores were not significantly correlated with sex, age, ethnicity, or total number of medical diagnoses. A BDI-PC cutoff score of 4 and above yielded 98% maximum clinical efficiency with 97% (95% CI 82%-99%) sensitivity and 99% (95% CI 94%-99%) specificity rates, respectively, for identifying patients with and without MDD. The BDI-PC is discussed as an effective case-finding instrument for screening primary care patients for MDD.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The BDI-II has adequate test-retest reliability and high internal consistency, and convergent validity has been established.31”
From The mind your health project: a randomized controlled trial of an innovative behavioral treatment for obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 · Cited by 9,349
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders
Spitzer, R. L., First, M. B., & Gibbon, M. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,582
Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study
Spitzer, R. L. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.272.22.1749 · Cited by 2,648
Case-finding instruments for depression: Two questions are as good as many
Whooley, M. A., Avins, A. L., Miranda, J., & Browner, W. S. (1997) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00076.x · Cited by 1,826
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (2012) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t07827-000 · Cited by 1,403
Beck, A. T., Guth, D., Steer, R. A., & Ball, R. (1997) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00025-9 · Cited by 733
Self-citationEpidemiology of depression in primary care
Katon, W. J., & Schulberg, H. C. (1992) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0163-8343(92)90094-q · Cited by 664
Case-Finding Instruments for Depression in Primary Care Settings
Mulrow, C. D., Williams, J. W., Gerety, M. B., Ramirez, G., Montiel, O. M., & Kerber, C. (1995) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-122-12-199506150-00004 · Cited by 456
Plumb, M. M., & Holland, J. C. (1977) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197707000-00007 · Cited by 337
Diagnosing depression in the hospitalized medically ill
Cavanaugh, S. V. A., Clark, D. C., & Gibbons, R. D. (1983) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(83)73151-8 · Cited by 288
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grace, S. L., Abbey, S. E., Shnek, Z. M., Irvine, J., Franche, R., & Stewart, D. E. (2002) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0163-8343(02)00179-2 · Cited by 687
Wang, J., Wu, X., Lai, W., Long, E., Zhang, X., Li, W., Zhu, Y., Chen, C., Zhong, X., Liu, Z., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017173 · Cited by 486
Screening for depression in primary care with two verbally asked questions: cross sectional study
Arroll, B., Khin, N., & Kerse, N. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1144 · Cited by 483
Witkiewitz, K., & Bowen, S. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019172 · Cited by 453
Youngstrom, E. A. (2013) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jst062 · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Steer, R. A., Cavalieri, T. A., Leonard, D. M., & Beck, A. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Steer, Robert A
- ORCID
- Beck, Aaron T
- Venue
- General Hospital Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 106-111
- ISSN
- 0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966975104
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 10.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, depression screening, primary care, case finding, internal medicine outpatients, cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity, internal consistency
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Depressive Disorder, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Internal Medicine, Male, Middle Aged, New Jersey, Primary Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reference Values, ROC Curve, Sampling Studies, Confidence Intervals, Sample Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
