Cited by 235Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Anxiety and arousal: physiological changes and their perception

Hoehn-Saric, Rudolf, McLeod, Daniel R.·2000·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Contrary to self-reports, most patients with chronic anxiety disorders exhibit increased muscle tension but not autonomic hyperarousal when at rest. Under everyday stress they tend to react with less physiological flexibility than normal controls. However, they overreact subjectively and physiologically to stimuli that are anxiety-provoking. Diminished physiological flexibility may be either a constitutional trait in anxious individuals, a partial but inadequate adaptation to prolonged stress or the result of a disregard for stressors that are not related to psychopathology. The effects of diminished physiological flexibility on general health are not known. There is only a weak relationship, and in some instances a desynchrony, between physiological changes and perception of change under stress. The inconsistencies between self-reports of physiological states and physiological recordings can be explained by alterations of body sensations through psychological factors, predominantly expectations and attention to bodily states, that lead to perceptual distortions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00339-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internal cues may be stronger in those with panic/anxiety, for example due to higher arousal.

    “Alternatively, internal cues may be stronger in those with panic/anxiety (e.g., higher arousal; Hoehn-Saric and Mcleod, 2000; Paulus and Stein, 2010).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Hoehn-Saric and Mcleod, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoehn-Saric, R., & McLeod, D. R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-12
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
217-224
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071872094
Cited by
235
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (IRO1MH42579, 1RO1MH35435)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
anxiety, muscle tension, physiological flexibility, stress response, bodily sensations, expectations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Attention, Humans, Perceptual Distortion, Somatoform Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review