Cited by 96Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Mind-Body Interactions in Anxiety and Somatic Symptoms

Open access
Mallorquí-Bagué, Núria, Bulbena, Antonio, Pailhez, Guillem, Garfinkel, Sarah N., Critchley, Hugo D.·2016·Harvard Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

Anxiety and somatic symptoms have a high prevalence in the general population. A mechanistic understanding of how different factors contribute to the development and maintenance of these symptoms, which are highly associated with anxiety disorders, is crucial to optimize treatments. In this article, we review recent literature on this topic and present a redefined model of mind-body interaction in anxiety and somatic symptoms, with an emphasis on both bottom-up and top-down processes. Consideration is given to the role played in this interaction by predisposing physiological and psychological traits (e.g., interoception, anxiety sensitivity, and trait anxiety) and to the levels at which mindfulness approaches may exert a therapeutic benefit. The proposed model of mind-body interaction in anxiety and somatic symptoms is appraised in the context of joint hypermobility syndrome, a constitutional variant associated with autonomic abnormalities and vulnerability to anxiety disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hrp.0000000000000085

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-state anxiety and depression can induce physiological changes, an intensified attention to the body and an alteration of the cognitive processing of physical sensations, representing important precipitating factors.

    “This might due to the fact that high-state anxiety and depression can induce physiological changes, an intensified attention to the body and an alteration of the cognitive processing of physical sensations, representing important precipitating factors (Mayou and Farmer, 2002; Janssens et al., 2010; Mallorquí-bagué et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mallorquí-Bagué, N., Bulbena, A., Pailhez, G., Garfinkel, S. N., & Critchley, H. D.
Affiliations
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
Venue
Harvard Review of Psychiatry
Published
2016-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
53-60
ISSN
1067-3229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2291646204
Cited by
96
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Harvard Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
mind-body problem, anxiety, somatic symptoms, interoception, anxiety sensitivity, trait anxiety, mindfulness, top-down and bottom-up processes, joint hypermobility syndrome, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Humans, Models, Biological, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical, Somatosensory Disorders, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review