Cited by 46Circadian rhythm and melatoninBipolar Disorder and TreatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Prevalence of seasonal affective disorder in primary care; a comparison of the seasonal health questionnaire and the seasonal pattern assessment questionnaire.

Thompson, Chris, Thompson, Susan, Smith, Rachel·2004·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Prevalence rates of SAD suggested by previous studies have ranged from 1 to 12% depending on the diagnostic criteria used. The Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ), a widely used screening tool, has been shown to have low specificity for SAD. The Seasonal Health Questionnaire (SHQ) was designed to better reflect the clinical criteria for SAD and has been shown to have a higher specificity then the SPAQ in a psychiatric outpatient setting.Objective The current study was designed to assess the validity of the SHQ in general practice against systematic research interviews, to compare the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values of the SHQ and the SPAQ and to use these data to estimate the prevalence of SAD in primary care.Methods 809 subjects in a consecutive series of patients attending Southampton general practices in winter 2000/01 completed the SHQ followed by the SPAQ; 56 were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID).Results The SHQ was more sensitive and specific than the SPAQ and had higher positive and negative predictive values in screening for SAD. The SPAQ indicated a prevalence of SAD of 10.7% (95% CI 8.6-13.1) while the SHQ provided a significantly lower estimate of 5.6% (95% CI 4.2-7.4).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00314-2

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, C., Thompson, S., & Smith, R.
Affiliations
  • Royal South Hants Hospital (GB)
  • West London Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Chris
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
219-226
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098235344
Cited by
46
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
seasonal affective disorder, Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire, sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value, prevalence, primary care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Seasonal Affective Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review