Cited by 15Coffee research and impactsFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Screening and Identification of Bitter Compounds in Roasted Coffee Brew by Taste Dilution Analysis

Frank, Oliver, Zehentbauer, Gerhard, Hofmann, Thomas·2006·Developments in food science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-4501(06)80039-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frank, O., Zehentbauer, G., & Hofmann, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
Venue
Developments in food science
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2006
Pages
165-168
ISSN
0167-4501 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1563601827
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developments in food science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
coffee bitterness, decaffeinated coffee

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review