Human–animal interactions in livestock production
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human interactions such as hitting, shouting, rough handling, sudden movements and loud noises can be perceived as negative by animals and increase fear of humans.
“Research showed that human interactions such as hitting, shouting, rough handling, sudden movements and loud noises can be perceived as negative by the animals and, therefore, increase fear of humans [19].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sources of stress in captivity
Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
New directions for zoo animal welfare science
Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N. (2013) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.004 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“Research showed that human interactions such as hitting, shouting, rough handling, sudden movements and loud noises can be perceived as negative by the animals and, therefore, increase fear of humans [19].”
BackgroundSelf-citationA preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo
Hosey, G. (2008) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.013 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Greco, B. J., Meehan, C. L., Hogan, J. N., Leighty, K. A., Mellen, J., Mason, G. J., & Mench, J. A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144276 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
The Pet-friendly Veterinary Practice
Herron, M. E., & Shreyer, T. (2014) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2014.01.010 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Domestication effects on behavioural and hormonal responses to acute stress in chickens
Ericsson, M., Fallahsharoudi, A., Bergquist, J., Kushnir, M. M., & Jensen, P. (2014) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.024 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders
de Jong, I., Berg, C., Butterworth, A., & Estevéz, I. (2012) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2012.en-295 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Boyle, L. A., & Mee, J. F. (2021) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.645537 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Nakonechny, L., Cisneros, A., Moody, C. M., & Stellato, A. C. (2025) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1634970 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hemsworth, P. H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hemsworth, P.H
- ORCID
- Hemsworth, P.H
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-198
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968271053
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 14.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Keywords
- human-animal interaction, livestock handling, animal welfare, fear of humans, stress, animal productivity, cognitive-behavioural intervention, dairy cattle, pigs, selection tools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
