Cited by 273Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaPrimate Behavior and Ecology

New directions for zoo animal welfare science

Whitham, Jessica C., Wielebnowski, Nadja·2013·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.004

Cites

174 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N.
Affiliations
  • Brookfield Zoo Chicago (US)
  • Oregon Zoo (US)
Corresponding author
Whitham, Jessica C.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
147
Issue
3-4
Pages
247-260
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130901336
Cited by
273
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9
FWCI
15.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
zoo animal welfare, positive affective states, environmental enrichment, immune function, aquariums

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review