Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 495

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)—methods and response rates

Open access
Dunstan, David W, Zimmet, Paul Z, Welborn, Timothy A, Cameron, Adrian J, Shaw, Jonathan, de Courten, Maximilian, Jolley, Damien, McCarty, Daniel J·2002·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab) addresses the urgent need for data on diabetes prevalence, risk factors and associated conditions in Australia. Here we describe the methods used and the response rates obtained. AusDiab was a population-based cross-sectional survey of national diabetes mellitus prevalence and associated risk factors in people aged > or =25 years, conducted between May 1999 and December 2000 in the six states and the Northern Territory of Australia. The study involved an initial household interview, followed by a biomedical examination that included an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), standard anthropometric tests, blood pressure measurements and the administration of questionnaires. Of the 20347 eligible people (aged > or =25 years and resident at the address for > or =6 months) who completed a household interview, 11247 (55.3%) attended for the biomedical examination. Of those who completed the biomedical examination 55.1% were female. Comparisons with the 1998 Australian population estimates showed that younger age responders were under-represented at the biomedical examination, while the middle-aged and older age groups were over-represented. Weighting of the AusDiab data for age and gender have corrected for this bias. AusDiab, which is the largest national diabetes prevalence study undertaken in a developed nation to have used an OGTT, provides a valuable national resource for the study of the prevalence and possible causes of diabetes, as well as identifying possible risk factors that may lead to diabetes. Furthermore, it generates the baseline data for a prospective 5-year cohort study. The data will be important for national and regional public health and lifestyle education and health promotion programs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-8227(02)00025-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 495

Metadata

Authors
Dunstan, D. W., Zimmet, P. Z., Welborn, T. A., Cameron, A. J., Shaw, J., de Courten, M., Jolley, D., & McCarty, D. J.
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
119-129
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052335573
Cited by
495
References
1
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)—methods and response rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-8227(02)00025-6
The paper
Dunstan, D. W., Zimmet, P. Z., Welborn, T. A., Cameron, A. J., Shaw, J., de Courten, M., Jolley, D., & McCarty, D. J. (2002). The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)—methods and response rates. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8227(02)00025-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.