Toward a Systems Theory of Motivated Behavior in Work Teams
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Team emergent states include team cohesion, team trust, and team motivation and engagement.
“Team emergent states include team cohesion (the bond among group members)161, team trust162, and team motivation and engagement159,163.”
From Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory (2022) · cites this paper as [159]
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835 · see citing works
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971 · see citing works
Higgins, E. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.12.1280 · Cited by 6,775 · see citing works
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659 · see citing works
Self-Organization in Biological Systems
Sneyd, J., Theraula, G., Bonabeau, E., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Franks, N. R. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9780691212920 · Cited by 2,949 · see citing works
Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338 · Cited by 2,319 · see citing works
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 · Cited by 1,428 · see citing works
The Role of Goal Orientation Following Performance Feedback
VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.629 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change
Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309352110 · Cited by 1,496 · see citing works
Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022465 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Myers, C. W., & Duran, J. L. (2013) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12009 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory
Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Inspired to perform: A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of thriving at work
Walumbwa, F. O., Muchiri, M. K., Misati, E., Wu, C., & Meiliani, M. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2216 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective
Liao, C. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Empowering Leadership and Effective Collaboration in Geographically Dispersed Teams
Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12108 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Motivating Employees to Explore Collaboration Technology in Team Contexts1
Maruping, L. M., & Magni, M. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.01 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Jungert, T., Van den Broeck, A., Schreurs, B., & Osterman, U. (2018) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12110 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Motivation and Satisfaction of Software Engineers
Franca, C., da Silva, F. Q. B., & Sharp, H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2018.2842201 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Criteria Issues and Team Effectiveness
Mathieu, J. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 2 · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0027 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Exploring antecedents of social loafing in students’ group work: A mixed-methods approach
Luo, Z., Marnburg, E., Øgaard, T., & Okumus, F. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education · doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100314 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Chen, G., & Kanfer, R.
- Venue
- Research in Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 223-267
- ISSN
- 0191-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985179664
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
- Keywords
- employee motivation, work teams, multilevel theory, personal motivation, team motivation, team processes, individual differences, cross-level interaction, management practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
