The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment as a tool for learning
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00138746 · Cited by 616
The use of self-assessment schedules in negotiated learning
Boud, D. (1992) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079212331382657 · Cited by 89
Cited by
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationA five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504676 · Cited by 916
Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396 · Cited by 560
A Review of Feedback Models and Theories: Descriptions, Definitions, and Conclusions
Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.720195 · Cited by 368
The Relevance of Prior Knowledge in Learning and Instructional Design
Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/aj7205113 · Cited by 312
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010 · Cited by 259
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002 · Cited by 218
Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1055233 · Cited by 195
Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055690600850354 · Cited by 196
Self-citationSecondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback
Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001 · Cited by 193
Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts
Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., & Smeets, S. (2011) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075071003759037 · Cited by 85
Self-citationRodríguez Rincón, Y., Munárriz, A., & Magreñán Ruiz, A. (2024) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101072 · Cited by 29
STUDENTS’ PREFERENCES IN ONLINE ASSESSMENT PROCESS: INFLUENCES ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES
CAKIROGLU, U., ERDOGDU, F., KOKOC, M., & ATABAY, M. (2017) · Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.17718/tojde.285721 · Cited by 22
A. DePaolo, C., & Wilkinson, K. (2014) · Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning · doi:10.28945/2057 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Dochy, F. J. R. C., & McDowell, L.
- Venue
- Studies in Educational Evaluation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 279-298
- ISSN
- 0191-491X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028048637
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
