Cited by 193Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational and Psychological AssessmentsEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback

Peterson, Elizabeth R., Irving, S. Earl·2008·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Elizabeth R.
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
238-250
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044381855
Cited by
193
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
27.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Teaching and Learning Research Initiative
  • New Zealand Council for Educational Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
student conceptions of assessment, feedback, high school students, student perceptions, assessment for learning, teacher accountability, school accountability, student learning, New Zealand schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review