The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“But is it fair?”: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing
Flinders, D. J. (1997) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(97)89858-8 · Cited by 7,238
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
Phenomenography ? Describing conceptions of the world around us
Marton, F. (1981) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00132516 · Cited by 3,266
Educational measurement, 3rd ed.
Linn, R. L. (1989) · Cited by 2,857
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Lucas, P., & Ramsden, P. (1992) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3120902 · Cited by 2,181
Moses, L. E., & Lindquist, E. F. (1951) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280411 · Cited by 1,661
(2013) · Learning and Awareness · doi:10.4324/9780203053690-8 · Cited by 991
Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment
Messick, S. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018002005 · Cited by 948
Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education
Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315004914 · Cited by 926
An argument-based approach to validity.
Kane, M. T. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.527 · Cited by 901
Cited by
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,569
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504676 · Cited by 916
Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001 · Cited by 885
Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930500099102 · Cited by 782
Metadata
- Authors
- Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S.
- Venue
- Studies in Educational Evaluation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-371
- ISSN
- 0191-491X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154325964
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “But is it fair?”: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0191-491x(97)86215-3
- The paper
- Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). “But is it fair?”: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-491x(97)86215-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
