Cited by 23Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementPersonality Traits and Psychology

Personality as predictor of mortality among patients with congestive heart failure: a two-year follow-up study

Murberg, Terje A, Bru, Edvin, Aarsland, Torbjorn·2001·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00067-2

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murberg, T. A., Bru, E., & Aarsland, T.
Affiliations
University of Stavanger (NO)
Corresponding author
Murberg, Terje A
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
749-757
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055397507
Cited by
23
References
35
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
neuroticism, congestive heart failure, mortality risk, personality traits, cardiovascular mortality, prognostic factors, long-term follow-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review