Cited by 118Psychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires?

Martin, B.A, Bowen, C.-C, Hunt, S.T·2002·Personality and Individual Differences

DOI 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.
Öneş, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.679 · Cited by 1,082
Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities.
Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.581 · Cited by 842
Social desirability scales: More substance than style.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.51.6.882 · Cited by 793
The big five personality dimensions and job performance
Rothmann, S., & Coetzer, E. P. (2003) · SA Journal of Industrial Psychology · doi:10.4102/sajip.v29i1.88 · Cited by 717
Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.261 · Cited by 544
Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement
Viswesvaran, C., & Öneş, D. S. (1999) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131649921969802 · Cited by 529
The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions.
Rosse, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L., & Levin, R. A. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.634 · Cited by 481
Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures.
Hicks, L. E. (1970) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0029780 · Cited by 478
The Effects of Social Desirability and Faking on Personality and Integrity Assessment for Personnel Selection
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.1998.9668033 · Cited by 294
Effects of Intentional Distortion in Personality Measurement and evaluation of Suggested Palliatives
Hough, L. M. (1998) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.1998.9668032 · Cited by 209
Towards a Theory of Applicant Faking: Integrating Studies of Deception
Snell, A. F., Sydell, E. J., & Lueke, S. B. (1999) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(99)00019-4 · Cited by 176
The Determination of Personality Inventory Factor Patterns and Intercorrelations by Changes in Real-Life Motivation
Michaelis, W., & Eysenck, H. J. (1971) · The Journal of Genetic Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221325.1971.10532611 · Cited by 163
The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality
Saville, P., & Willson, E. (1991) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1991.tb00556.x · Cited by 154
The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality
Bartram, D. (1996) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00597.x · Cited by 152
Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests
Johnson, C. E., Wood, R. E., & Blinkhorn, S. (1988) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00279.x · Cited by 148
A STUDY OF FAKING BEHAVIOR ON A FORCED‐CHOICE SELF‐DESCRIPTION CHECKLIST
Dunnette, M. D., McCartney, J. L., Carlson, H. C., & Kirchner, W. K. (1962) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1962.tb01843.x · Cited by 111
Faking personality questionnaires: Fabricating different profiles for different purposes
Furnham, A. F. (1990) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02686767 · Cited by 107
Pre-employment honesty testing: Fakability, reactions of test takers, and company image
Ryan, A. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1987) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf01020813 · Cited by 106
Knowing and Faking One's Five-Factor Personality Score
Furnham, A. F. (1997) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6901_14 · Cited by 99
The Modification of Personality and Lie Scale Scores by Special ‘Honesty’ Instructions
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Shaw, L. K. (1974) · British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1974.tb00876.x · Cited by 78
Response strategies when faking personality questionnaires in a vocational selection setting
Mahar, D., Cologon, J., & Duck, J. M. (1995) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)00200-c · Cited by 50
Social desirability in the Eysenck Personality Inventory
Dunnett, S. B., Koun, S., & BARBER, P. J. (1981) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1981.tb02158.x · Cited by 38
Simulated patterns on the California Psychological Inventory.
Dicken, C. F. (1960) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046078 · Cited by 27
A Note on the “Fakability” of Forced‐Choice Scales
Waters, L. K. (1965) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1965.tb00277.x · Cited by 25
Fakeability and correlates of the perception and preference inventory
Furnham, A. F., & Craig, S. (1987) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(87)90207-8 · Cited by 21
Predicting Occupational Personality Test Scores
Furnham, A. F., & Drakeley, R. J. (2000) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980009600853 · Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Stanush, P. L. (1997). Factors that influence the susceptibility of self-report inventories to distortion: a meta-analytic investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A, & M University.

Sorted by citations

The Hungry Mind
von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro‐Premuzic, T. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611421204 · Cited by 550
A Meta‐Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures
Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. Τ., & Smith, M. A. (2006) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00354.x · Cited by 400
The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support?
Rothstein, M. G., & Goffin, R. D. (2006) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.004 · Cited by 351
Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment
Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1803_4 · Cited by 250
Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions
Griffith, R. L., Wolfeld, L., Armon, B. K., Rios, J., & Liu, O. L. (2016) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12112 · Cited by 211

See all 118

Authors: Martin, B. A., Bowen, C.-C., & Hunt, S. T.
Affiliations: John Carroll University (US)
Cleveland State University (US)
Corresponding author: Martin, B.A
ORCID: Hunt, S.T
Venue: Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2002-01
Volume: 32
Issue: 2
Pages: 247-256
ISSN: 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6
OpenAlex: W2041313426
Cited by: 117
References: 27
Citations by year: 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI: 7.84
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords: faking, personality tests, person-job fit, HR professionals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires?

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks