Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data poisoning attacks can weaken an AI system's ability to discern between good and bad data by adding distorted inputs to the training samples.
“Attacks using data poison the ability of an AI system to discern between good and bad data can be weakened by adding distorted inputs to the training samples for such an artifcial intelligence ML procedure.”
From Artificial Intelligence in the Military: An Overview of the Capabilities, Applications, and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [115]
AI-based evaluations by the United States Cyber Authority's Unified Platform could have led to a direct nuclear war between two militarily strong countries.
“Tis could have led to a direct nuclear war between two militarily strong countries and led to global warfare [115].”
From Artificial Intelligence in the Military: An Overview of the Capabilities, Applications, and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [115]
Some evidence suggests that faking has a surprisingly minimal effect on predicting job performance.
“Some evidence suggests that faking has a surprisingly minimal effect on predicting job performance.”
From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Hough, Eaton, Dunnette et al. [1990]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
Poropat, A. E. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014996 · Cited by 2,729 · see citing works
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160 · Cited by 2,356 · see citing works
Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292 · Cited by 1,176 · see citing works
Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021212 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
ROBERTS, B. W., CHERNYSHENKO, O. S., STARK, S., & GOLDBERG, L. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers.
Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.5.469 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Personality Psychology and Economics
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w16822 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033901 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.
McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.812 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Uziel, L. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610369465 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019216 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Self-citationReconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment
Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1803_4 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
SCHMIDT, F. L., SHAFFER, J. A., & OH, I. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00132.x · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L. A., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.472 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Why is Conscientiousness negatively correlated with intelligence?
Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Paltiel, L. (2004) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.010 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Rashid, A. B., Kausik, A. K., Al Hassan Sunny, A., & Bappy, M. H. (2023) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1155/2023/8676366 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires?
Martin, B. A., Bowen, C.-C., & Hunt, S. T. (2002) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Converse, P. D., Oswald, F. L., Imus, A., Hedricks, C., Roy, R., & Butera, H. (2008) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00420.x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Personality and High-Maintenance Employee Behavior
Burke, L. A., & Witt, L. A. (2004) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1023/b:jobu.0000016711.90781.58 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
HAUSKNECHT, J. P. (2010) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01171.x · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Martínez, A., Salgado, J. F., & Lado, M. (2022) · Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones · doi:10.5093/jwop2022a16 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 581-595
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2021943838
- Cited by
- 842
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 21.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- criterion validity, personality constructs, response distortion, personality assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
