Cited by 118Psychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires?

Martin, B.A, Bowen, C.-C, Hunt, S.T·2002·Personality and Individual Differences

DOI 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.
Öneş, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.679 · Cited by 1,082
Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities.
Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.581 · Cited by 842
Social desirability scales: More substance than style.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.51.6.882 · Cited by 793
The big five personality dimensions and job performance
Rothmann, S., & Coetzer, E. P. (2003) · SA Journal of Industrial Psychology · doi:10.4102/sajip.v29i1.88 · Cited by 717
Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.261 · Cited by 544
Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement
Viswesvaran, C., & Öneş, D. S. (1999) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131649921969802 · Cited by 529
The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions.
Rosse, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L., & Levin, R. A. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.634 · Cited by 481
Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures.
Hicks, L. E. (1970) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0029780 · Cited by 478
The Effects of Social Desirability and Faking on Personality and Integrity Assessment for Personnel Selection
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.1998.9668033 · Cited by 294

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Stanush, P. L. (1997). Factors that influence the susceptibility of self-report inventories to distortion: a meta-analytic investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A, & M University.

Sorted by citations

The Hungry Mind
von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro‐Premuzic, T. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611421204 · Cited by 550
A Meta‐Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures
Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. Τ., & Smith, M. A. (2006) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00354.x · Cited by 400
The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support?
Rothstein, M. G., & Goffin, R. D. (2006) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.004 · Cited by 351
Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment
Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1803_4 · Cited by 250
Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions
Griffith, R. L., Wolfeld, L., Armon, B. K., Rios, J., & Liu, O. L. (2016) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12112 · Cited by 211
Increasing Validity with Forced-Choice Criterion Measurement Formats
Bartram, D. (2007) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00386.x · Cited by 132
Scalar Equivalence of OPQ32
Bartram, D. (2011) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022111430258 · Cited by 111
Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework
Brown, A. (2014) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9434-9 · Cited by 110
Situational Judgment Tests and their Predictiveness of College Students’ Success: The Influence of Faking
Peeters, H., & Lievens, F. (2004) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164404268672 · Cited by 109
Assessing Civic Competency and Engagement in Higher Education: Research Background, Frameworks, and Directions for Next‐Generation Assessment
Torney-Purta, J. V., Cabrera, J. C., Roohr, K. C., Liu, O. L., & Rios, J. A. (2015) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12081 · Cited by 113
Predicting creativity and academic success with a “Fake-Proof” measure of the Big Five
Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. (2008) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.006 · Cited by 90
Predicting academic success with the Big 5 rated from different points of view: Self‐rated, other rated and faked
Ziegler, M. D., Danay, E., Schölmerich, F., & Bühner, M. (2010) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.753 · Cited by 76
Fakability of Implicit and Explicit Measures of the Big Five: Research findings from organizational settings
Vecchione, M., Dentale, F., Alessandri, G., & Barbaranelli, C. (2014) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12070 · Cited by 72
Emotional Intelligence and Mindfulness: Relation and Enhancement in the Classroom With Adolescents
Ledo, C. R., Hernández, S. O., Moreno, M. J. C., Balaguer, Á., & Alzugaray, F. J. Z. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02162 · Cited by 77
Personality Types of Entrepreneurs
Müller, G. F., & Gappisch, C. (2005) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.96.3.737-746 · Cited by 61
Examining stability of personality profile solutions between Likert-type and multidimensional forced choice measure
Lee, P., Joo, S., & Lee, S. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.022 · Cited by 54
Gender, fear of crime, and self-presentation: an experimental investigation
Sutton, R. M., Robinson, B., & Farrall, S. D. (2010) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/10683160903292261 · Cited by 48
The general factor of personality: Substance or artefact?
Paul Irwing, B. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.002 · Cited by 51
Online Testing: Mode of Administration and the Stability of OPQ 32i Scores
Bartram, D., & Brown, A. (2004) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.0965-075x.2004.282_1.x · Cited by 48
Fakability of different measurement methods for achievement motivation: Questionnaire, semi-projective, and objective.
Ziegler, M. D., Schmidt-Atzert, L., Bühner, M., & Krumm, S. (2007) · Psychology science · Cited by 45
First Dates and Little White Lies: A Trait Contract Classification Theory of Applicant Faking Behavior
Griffith, R., Lee, L. M., Peterson, M. H., & Zickar, M. J. (2011) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.597475 · Cited by 45
Forced-Choice Versus Likert Responses on an Occupational Big Five Questionnaire
Watrin, L., Geiger, M., Spengler, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2019) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000285 · Cited by 45
The impact of “non-targeted traits” on personality test faking, hiring, and workplace deviance
O’Neill, T., Lee, N. M., Radan, J., Law, S. J., Lewis, R. J., & Carswell, J. J. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.027 · Cited by 36
The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach
Ng, V., Lee, P., Ho, M. R., Kuykendall, L. E., Stark, S. E., & Tay, L. (2020) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2020.1739056 · Cited by 35
The “g” in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection
Geiger, M., Olderbak, S. G., Sauter, R., & Wilhelm, O. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02153 · Cited by 36
Modelling Forced‐Choice Response Formats
Brown, A., & Maydeu‐Olivares, A. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118489772.ch18 · Cited by 38
Psychological diagnostics in the talent development program of the German Football Association: Psychometric properties of an Internet-based test battery
Feichtinger, P., & Höner, O. (2014) · German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research · doi:10.1007/s12662-014-0341-0 · Cited by 29
Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury products? A tale of two major cities in two different countries
Kassim, N. M., Zain, M., Bogari, N., & Sharif, K. J. (2020) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-06-2019-0361 · Cited by 29
Stereotyping as a response strategy when faking personality questionnaires
Mahar, D., Coburn, B., Griffin, N., Hemeter, F., Potappel, C., Turton, M., & Mulgrew, K. E. (2006) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.018 · Cited by 29
Ideal Point Modeling of Non-cognitive Constructs: Review and Recommendations for Research
Tay, L., & Ng, V. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02423 · Cited by 27
Impact of Elaboration on Responding to Situational Judgment Test Items
Lievens, F., & Peeters, H. (2008) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00440.x · Cited by 27
The role of fluid and emotional intelligence in malingering
Grieve, R., & Mahar, D. (2009) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530903032836 · Cited by 27
The relationship between cognitive ability and personality scores in selection situations: A meta‐analysis
Schilling, M., Becker, N., Grabenhorst, M. M., & König, C. J. (2021) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12314 · Cited by 20
How much can people fake on the dark triad? A meta-analysis and systematic review of instructed faking
Walker, S., Double, K. S., Birney, D. P., & MacCann, C. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111622 · Cited by 26
Recovering Preipsative Information From Additive Ipsatized Data
Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282486 · Cited by 20
Deception and Applicant Faking: Putting the Pieces Together
Kim, B. H. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118311141.ch7 · Cited by 18
Do Applicants Fake Their Personality Questionnaire Responses and How Successful are Their Attempts? A Case of Military Pilot Cadet Selection
Galić, Z., Jerneić, Ž., & Kovačić, M. P. (2012) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00595.x · Cited by 19
Toxic Mold and Mycotoxins in Neurotoxicity Cases: Stachybotrys, Fusarium, Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Cladosporium, Alternaria, Trichothecenes
Lees-Haley, P. (2003) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.2003.93.2.561 · Cited by 15
A New Investigation of Fake Resistance of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Measure: An Application of Differential Item/Test Functioning
Lee, P., & Joo, S. (2021) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2021.01.004 · Cited by 18
The Interactive Effect of Impression Motivation and Cognitive Schema on Self‐Presentation in a Personality Inventory1
Jansen, A., König, C. J., Kleinmann, M., & Melchers, K. G. (2012) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00925.x · Cited by 17
Factors Related to Faking Ability: A Structural Equation Model Application
Wrensen, L., & Biderman, M. D. (2005) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e518612013-089 · Cited by 17
Does Design Matter? The (Limited) Effects of Six Asynchronous Video Interview Design Features on Impression Management, Reactions, and Evaluations
Lukacik, E., & Bourdage, J. S. (2024) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12511 · Cited by 20
Negative views of out-groups and emotion regulation strategies: Evidence for an association with the tendency to suppress emotion expression, but not with cognitive reappraisal or emotion dysregulation
Westerlund, M., Antfolk, J., & Santtila, P. O. (2019) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00430-7 · Cited by 17
Forced-choice and conventional personality assessment: Each may have unique value in pre-employment testing
Goffin, R. D., Jang, I., & Skinner, E. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.012 · Cited by 14
The Motivational Value Systems Questionnaire (MVSQ): Psychometric Analysis Using a Forced Choice Thurstonian IRT Model
Merk, J., Schlotz, W., & Falter, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01626 · Cited by 14
A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats
Lee, H., & Smith, W. Z. (2019) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164419871659 · Cited by 17
Not Aggressive or Just Faking It? Examining Faking and Faking Detection on the Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression
Wiita, N. E., Meyer, R. D., Kelly, E. D., & Collins, B. J. (2017) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428117703685 · Cited by 14
Reliability Estimates for IRT-Based Forced-Choice Assessment Scores
Lin, Y. (2021) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428121999086 · Cited by 14
The effects of faking on non-cognitive predictors of academic performance in University students
Huws, N., Reddy, P. A., & Talcott, J. B. (2009) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.04.003 · Cited by 13
Faking in Self‐Report Personality Scales: A Qualitative Analysis and Taxonomy of the Behaviors That Constitute Faking Strategies
Röhner, J., Schütz, A., & Ziegler, M. D. (2024) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12513 · Cited by 12
Is it enough to be willing to win or do you have to be smart? The relationship between competitive worldviews, cognitive abilities, and applicant faking in personality tests
Schilling, M., Sparfeldt, J. R., Becker, N., Engel, M., Levacher, J., Sebastian, T. F. P., Schäfer, J., Schwabe, S., & König, C. J. (2020) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12296 · Cited by 12
A cross-validation of between country differences in personality using the OPQ32
Bartram, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education · doi:10.1504/ijqre.2013.056460 · Cited by 11
How Emotional Intelligence Might Get You the Job: The Relationship Between Trait Emotional Intelligence and Faking on Personality Tests
Pelt, D. H. M., van der Linden, D., & Born, M. P. (2017) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2017.1407320 · Cited by 13
Deception and Applicant Faking: Putting the Pieces Together
Kim, B. H. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119992592.ch7 · Cited by 11
Modeling Effects of Faking on an Objective Personality Test
Arendasy, M., Sommer, M., Herle, M., Schützhofer, B., & Inwanschitz, D. (2011) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000053 · Cited by 10
Personality in information systems professions: identifying archetypal professions with suitable traits and candidates' ability to fake-good these traits
Tomat, L., Trkman, P., & Manfreda, A. (2021) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-03-2021-0212 · Cited by 9
Verfälschungstendenzen im NEO-FFI: Eine experimentelle Überprüfung
Krahé, B., & Herrmann, J. (2003) · Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie · doi:10.1024//0170-1789.24.2.105 · Cited by 9
The Impact of Aberrant Responses and Detection in Forced‐Choice Noncognitive Assessment
Kim, S., & Moses, T. P. (2018) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12222 · Cited by 8
Multidimensional Forced-Choice CAT With Dominance Items: An Empirical Comparison With Optimal Static Testing Under Different Desirability Matching
Lin, Y., Brown, A., & Williams, P. (2022) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131644221077637 · Cited by 7
IVR and web administration in structured interviews utilizing rating scales: exploring the role of motivation as a moderator to mode effects
Yang, Y., Callegaro, M., Bhola, D. S., & Dillman, D. A. (2010) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645570903504161 · Cited by 7
Interventions for Addressing Faking on Personality Assessments for Employee Selection: A Meta-Analysis
Adair, C. K. (2014) · Digital Commons-DePaul (DePaul University) · Cited by 7
The Journey of Forced Choice Measurement Over 80 Years: Past, Present, and Future
Lee, P., Son, M., Zhou, S., Joo, S., Jia, Z., & Cheng, V. (2025) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/10944281251350687 · Cited by 20
The incremental validity of a Situational Judgement Test (SJT) relative to personality and cognitive ability to predict managerial performance
Fertig, S. (2009) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) · Cited by 6
Can ChatGPT Outperform Humans in Faking a Personality Assessment While Avoiding Detection?
Robie, C., Phillips, J., Bourdage, J. S., Christiansen, N. D., Dunlop, P. D., Risavy, S. D., & Speer, A. B. (2025) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.70015 · Cited by 6
Contributions to Constructing Forced-Choice Questionnaires Using the Thurstonian IRT Model
Sun, L., Qin, Z., Wang, S., Tian, X., & Luo, F. (2023) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2023.2248979 · Cited by 5
The influence of different rating scales on impression management in high stakes assessment
Khorramdel, L. (2014) · Psychological test and assessment modeling · Cited by 5
Investigation of relationship between personality characteristics and career management of Melli Bank staff, Iran
Yavarpour, H., Peykani, M. H., & Gholizadeh, A. (2016) · Problems and Perspectives in Management · doi:10.21511/ppm.14(3-si).2016.15 · Cited by 5
Defining, Measuring, and Scaling Affective Constructs
McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6_2 · Cited by 5
Assessing Cross-Cultural Competence: A Working Framework and Prototype Measures for Use in Military Contexts
Brenneman, M. W., Klafehn, J. L., Burrus, J. T., Roberts, R. D., & Kochert, J. F. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42166-7_8 · Cited by 4
Diagnostische Verfahren
Schmidt-Atzert, L., Krumm, S., & Amelang, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-61643-7_3 · Cited by 4
Happiness at work : are job satisfaction, job self-efficacy and trait emotional intelligence related?
de Kok, A. G., & Anne, C. (2013) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 4
Bortom Big Five: Konstruktion och validering av ett personlighetstestPreprint
Sjöberg, L. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
How Item Response Theory can solve problems of ipsative data
Brown, A. (2010) · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · Cited by 4
Development of a Forced-Choice Personality Inventory via Thurstonian Item Response Theory (TIRT)
Tsaousis, I., & Al-Owidha, A. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14121118 · Cited by 4
Can behavioral features reveal lying in an online personality questionnaire? The impact of mouse dynamics and speech
Kuric, E., Demcak, P., Smrecek, P., & Stefan Benus, A. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100683 · Cited by 3
Lässt sich der Einfluss sozialer Erwünschtheit in einem Fragebogen zur Erfassung aggressiver Verhaltensweisen im Straßenverkehr korrigieren?
Herzberg, P. Y. (2004) · Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/0170-1789.25.1.19 · Cited by 3
Scoring methods for ordinal multidimensional forced-choice items
de Vries, A. L. M., & van der Ark, L. A. (2008) · Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) · Cited by 3
Examining the fakability of forced-choice individual differences measures
Cao, M. (2016) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 3
Influence Factors of College Students' Creativity: The Effect of Self-Esteem and Motivation
Liu, L. (2019) · Psychology and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.11648/j.pbs.20190802.13 · Cited by 3
Situational Demand and Its Impact on Construct and Criterion Validity of a Personality Questionnaire: State and Trait, a Couple you just can’t Study Separately!
Ziegler, M. D. (2007) · doi:10.5282/edoc.6504 · Cited by 3
Applicant Faking Behavior
Griffith, R., Converse, P. D., Mochinushi, Y., & Ziegler, M. D. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781119173489.ch28 · Cited by 3
The Potential of Online Selection
Bartram, D., & Tippins, N. T. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781118972472.ch13 · Cited by 3
Impact of Perceived Organizational Politics on Job Satisfaction and Organization Citizenship Behavior
Ahmed, M. R., Naz, S., & Ahmed, I. (2022) · UW Journal of Management Sciences · doi:10.56220/uwjms.v3i2.28 · Cited by 2
Faking Resistance of Forced‐Choice and Single‐Statement Personality Measures: Stress‐Testing With Humans and Generative AI
Robie, C., Feeney, J. R., Rasheed, S., Bourdage, J. S., Christiansen, N. D., Dunlop, P. D., & Daljeet, K. N. (2026) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.70075 · Cited by 2
Applying generalized analysis of covariance for accommodating individual differences: A study effect of faking on personality test
Widhiarso, W. (2018) · Anuario de Psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.anpsic.2018.10.002 · Cited by 2
Item Response Theory Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires
Morillo, D. (2018) · Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) · Cited by 2
Typology of Ideal Personality: Applicant Perspective In Job Selection Setting
Widhiarso, W. (2012) · Cited by 1
MOVING BEYOND TRADITIONAL WARNINGS: EFFECTS OF ALTERNATE INSTRUCTIONS ON FAKING AND APPLICANT REACTIONS
Ramakrishnan, M. (2005) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 1
Item and Person Characteristics as Predictors of Faking
Day, N. T. (2008) · Journal of Bioresource Management · Cited by 1
A Review of the Research on Faking and Impression Management in the Interview
孙, 仁. (2020) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2020.1010171 · Cited by 1
Forcing Choices in Personality Measurement
Converse, P. D., Oswald, F. L., Imus, A. L., Hedricks, C. A., Roy, R., & Butera, H. (2006) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-564-620251011 · Cited by 1
Exploration of Faking on Measures of Dark Side of Personality in terms of Gender, Response Situation, Type of Measures
김시나, Han, Y., & Kim, M. (2014) · The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology · doi:10.18205/kpa.2014.19.1.004 · Cited by 1
Impression Management across Applicant and Incumbent Contexts: The Effect on Job Performance
Filipkowski, J. N. (2012) · Journal of Bioresource Management · Cited by 1
Ledarskap och personlighet: Testning av jagstyrkaPreprint
Sjöberg, L. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1
The validation of two social desirability questionnaires in the South African context
Coetzee, E. (2015) · Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University) · Cited by 1
Capturing the effect of personality on teams with agent-based modelling
Farhangian, M. (2018) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) · Cited by 1
Références
Rolland, J. (2004) · Mardaga eBooks · doi:10.3917/mard.rolla.2004.01.0219 · Cited by 1
Ipsative Measures of Personality
Kowalski, C. M., & Schermer, J. A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_695 · Cited by 1
The Developing of Faking Detection Scale in Application Situation
Fang, L. U. O., Liu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2010) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2010.00791
Comparación de perfiles psicológicos en selección de personal bajo los efectos de simulación (“faking”) real y experimental
Solá, A. Z., & Rosario-Hernández, E. (2014) · Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología · doi:10.33881/2027-1786.rip.7209

Authors: Martin, B. A., Bowen, C.-C., & Hunt, S. T.
Affiliations: John Carroll University (US)
Cleveland State University (US)
Corresponding author: Martin, B.A
ORCID: Hunt, S.T
Venue: Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2002-01
Volume: 32
Issue: 2
Pages: 247-256
ISSN: 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6
OpenAlex: W2041313426
Cited by: 117
References: 27
Citations by year: 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI: 7.84
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords: faking, personality tests, person-job fit, HR professionals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires?

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks